Be glad to go through the changm the october draft to the novembt and give a brief explanation one made the change and why its ree to the motion and perhaps that d help jump start the discussion. Chair keane does that help commissioner kopp . Yes. First change that we made wao section 1. 126 which is the ban n contribution from caters to off contractors to official officiae the contract to the city. We strengthen the notification n located in section 1. 126f in te ordinance, the concern raised be commission is persons subject tn may not know they are and unwity violate it. So they want to help ensure thal persons subject to this rule knt they are. Generally speaking, the way thid work is that the City Department issues a request for bids wouldo notify potential bidders that te rules that they would be subjecf they submit a bid to the city be 1. 26 applies to bidders not juss with a contract already. That would give the entity or pn notice that these rules exist. Then once the City Depa
Requirement. Chair keane just to add a couple of things to what you said, those friday meetings in the first quarter, the one on january 12th and february 89th would be at 10 00 in the morning. Thats correct. Chair keane and on friday march 16th that would be at 1 00 p. M. Correct. Chair keane all the rest after that a tuesdays at 10 00 a. M. Those would be special meetings and adopted if you took this approach. The bylaw change would refer to a second tuesday meeting that would be as a regular matter a second tuesday at 10 00 going forward. We presume the dates for that would be available into 2019 if the commission were wr to take this approach. Approach. Chair keane commissioners, your thoughts. Im for it. Chair keane commissioner p kopp is for it. Commissioner lee. Thank you mr. Chair and i want to thank the staff for the diligent work in putting the full schedules together. I was one of the commissioners who asked the staff to look into possibly finding other meeting times for fut
Limited it to the payments of 5r more, and only at the behest ofd officials. Lets think about the disclosur. Disclosure is no enforcing mech. Who is going to know this . Except the relatively few peoplf what . A850,000 residents . And probably 420, 430 registeres except those in this room and me more people who are watching on television . Then what happens if there is disclosure . There is no city hall coverage . Yes, i will pull history, when a supervisor, that press room was. Every desk, occupied. Nobody will know about this exca very few number of the 850,000 , approximately, who live in San Francisco. Let me just conclude by saying m disappointed. I voted no last month because i perceived that my fellow commiss wanted something to show for tid effort including all the time at of the staff. Realizing that there are four vt are going to pass it. Then, i com i come in tonight at all the givea ways still donty those San Francisco saints who e any application of prohibitionso nonprofit
Its defined getting page nur you. That is page 29 of agenda item. The payment that is made at thet of an officer or agent thereof s made principally for a legislatr government or charitable nature. We did create what i think is an important exception. You can see on the next page, ts for public appeal. Public appeal is a request for t when such request is made by mef television, radio, billboard. The distribution of 500 or more identical pieces of printed matr a speech to 500 or more individ. There is an exception in this rg system where if an official maka request, via public appeal, then disloashedisclosurethendisclosu. This came up and we tried to crs exception so the appeal would ne caught up in this because its e kind of conduct that staff belie commission was looking at when s looking at 3. 2784 when it instrs to create a disclosure testimon. Indeed we publicly said thate time. Right. So this is an idea contained in, i wanted to highlight that to st idea has been carried over and
Commission is charged to carry out oversights that impact folks who may not be San Francisco residents, but their work impacts San Francisco residents. Their perspectives and engagement for me is also critical so that as we deliberate policies and other action items, its good to have all sides perspectives. I hear folks who want to keep it the way it is. I understand that. But at the same time to really try to broaden up the participatory pull, so to speak, id like for us to try this out as a trial run. Because as a bylaw, we can always change it. But at least make it available for folks who otherwise could not make it in the evening times so that they can attend, they can add their perspective as we engage with the public. So i would like to make a motion to approve this proposal from the staff. Chair keane is there a second . Second. Chair keane i agree completely with commissioner lee in regard to what she said. Id like to add a couple of owe other things. In regard to the commissio