Changes and significant changes about very what you see as very big problems, when you use a sledgehammer instead of a tiny point, you can do more damage in the effect you have on the smaller nonprofits who are already monitored or already account for every penny we spend in our monitoring and our contracts and everything that you do. When you begin adding more layers of accountablity for very small things because youre trying to get at a very big target, you do more harm than good, so id ask you to keep that in mind. We appreciate the time and effort thats gone into all of this, the changes that were listened to and thoughtfully put into the document you have before you. We have debbie my colleague, debbie, indicated we still have concerns about a number of the items, but we would hope, at this point, you would be ready to move this onto the board and let them take care of the finetuning. Thank you. President keane thank you. My name is january masoca. Im the director of the Californi
Reinvent the wheel and she does something and goes down the track and were trying to play catch up or undo or mitigate the things that shes been doing so that if we can join forces and work collaboratively together to create a holistic review and assessment and changes moving forward, i think that would be something that that would be important to me. President keane maybe if you both can think of that before fridays meeting and sort of brief us on any thoughts that you have as to how we should approach supervisor kim regarding those things. Certainly. We can definitely provide you with some preliminary remarks. President keane thats great. So switching over to page 4, the other planned projects, again, these were sort of things, again, why we sort of need to revisit our where you would like us to focus our attention Going Forward because we have the annual policy plan that had these items setup. Weve had to push them back a couple times now. I think these are sort of the Major Project
On the record. Next, disclosure of bidding information. Where do you find that in section 1126. Id have to refer to my colleague on that one. They have three, which refers any respective party to a contract shall, by the submission of a proposal for such contract. The word proposal may need changes, as i pointed out today to our executive director, because a proposal, to me, means an rfp response, not a competitive bid, but theres no reference to a competitive bid there. Is there . Im happy to have debbie speak to bullet point number three. Why is that . Why is that . Yeah. Because she knows this issue better than i do. All right. Thank you, mr. Chairman. Yeah, wheres the Competitive Bidding . Is. The staff drafted this. I know the staff drafted it. The ordinance which was approved last month. Yes. If i may make sure i get suppose were now asked to approve again this month, but where is the Competitive Bidding in that section 1126 . Its not, i guess. Kyle can answer that. I dont think
All in all, this is a roughly 10 increase over our base operating budget, and this is something that we think is critical to get us in the right structure and setting to keep delivering on the things that weve identified as a priority as a department in the last couple of years. So im happy to answer any questions. Weve basically presented an overview and score card based on the goals we identified two years ago in our blueprint for accountablity, and this reflects our best judgment where weve been able to make some strides and the work we still have to do. The last we talk often about our performance indicators, and how were doing. We hope our work speaks for itself. We have a lot of work to be done, but were proud of what weve done, so one of the things that we have done this year is to make sure that we are closely aligning our individual performance goals each year with the overall organizations top priorities, so we have an annual performance goal discussion with employees, so we
Ordinance identified as 2017 wpo ballot measure, attachment one, and have it placed on the june ballot. I have a clarifying question for staff. I understand that the ballot measure and the ordinance as drafted there are slight differences as between the two. Could you give a summary of that to make sure i understand what is what would be miss from the version that would go on the ballot . Due to the jurisdiction of the authority we had to slightly scale back and narrow what would be in the full legislative proposal. It is 4. 105 to govern the overall scope of complaints whichca raise other can raise other concerns. Those were removed. The other big category were the proposed edits to 4. 107. That would have addressed the Whistleblower Program outsides of the Ethics Commission as well. The bulk and i will let the staff speak to the policy impact. The bulk of the amendments are still there in the ballot measure version. For those provisions excluded from the ballot measure provision, wha