Autopsies will solve the mystery. 35yearold roger and his wife val were found dead on deacon street. Roger was a former Software Engineer and 42yearold val was an eye researcher that earned advanced degrees from berkeley where they met. Marty vance was her advisor when she got her degree from cal. She was a very happy person who was a great point in her career. Thing were going well. Her husband was fun guy and energetic and bright guy. A woman that knows the couple call police about one monday afternoon after finding roger and his cats unresponsive. Police and firefighters went inside and found valeries body. Authorities have ruled out radiation or a gas or Carbon Monoxide mix. No signs of violence or foul play. As we come back out here live. The autopsy will be the key for that toxicology test to take some time. This is the latest so the mystery continues in berkeley. Henry lee, fox 2 news. Crews worked to pull a vehicle from an Alameda Creek hoping to locate the driver but not found
I feel. Different. Yeah. Get off me, christina aguilera. Drink this, eric. God, help me. Shes gone. Thank god. Well, thanks wait a minute. Phil collins sucks ass yeah, what the hell were we thinking . Boo i think its working. [all booing] shut your filthy holes, you little bastards get off the stage, phil collins we want timmy all yeah. You just want to laugh at him. No, you see, we learned something today. Yeah, sure, we laughed at timmy, but whats wrong with laughter . Just because we laugh at something doesnt mean we dont care about it. Timmy made us smile and playing made timmy smile, so where is the harm in that . The people that are wrong are the ones that think people like timmy should be protected and kept out of the publics eye. The cool thing about timmy being in a band was that he was in your face, and you had to deal with him, whether you laughed or cried or felt nothing. Thats why timmy rules. Yeah. Timmy, timmy [all chanting] Timmy Timmy Timmy man, it sucks not being part
I feel. Different. Yeah. Get off me, christina aguilera. Drink this, eric. God, help me. Shes gone. Thank god. Well, thanks wait a minute. Phil collins sucks ass yeah, what the hell were we thinking . Boo i think its working. [all booing] shut your filthy holes, you little bastards get off the stage, phil collins we want timmy all yeah. You just want to laugh at him. No, you see, we learned something today. Yeah, sure, we laughed at timmy, but whats wrong with laughter . Just because we laugh at something doesnt mean we dont care about it. Timmy made us smile and playing made timmy smile, so where is the harm in that . The people that are wrong are the ones that think people like timmy should be protected and kept out of the publics eye. The cool thing about timmy being in a band was that he was in your face, and you had to deal with him, whether you laughed or cried or felt nothing. Thats why timmy rules. Yeah. Timmy, timmy [all chanting] Timmy Timmy Timmy man, it sucks not being part
We not have that outside distraction, and i am inclined to say i wouldnt want them in the Appellate Court chambers. I think it would be good for the public to see what is going on. I dont know how long they would be interested in what goes on in the appellate argument to the if doesnt rivet the attention except perhaps in the cases that have gotten a tremendous amount of publicity. I would see no reason why beyond that concern that th concerned n people shouldnt have access. My view on that is i dont see any problem with having the proceedings televised. I think that it would be good for the public. At this time a vote in favor of the judicial conference of experimenting with television in the courtrooms. That has been carried out. The results of that are being evaluated in the federal system. My particular Appeals Court was not a part of the experiment but not from the unwillingness. Its because they could only have a small number. That is the circumstance in which i think my vote in
We not have that outside distraction, and i am inclined to say i wouldnt want them in the Appellate Court chambers. I think it would be good for the public to see what is going on. I dont know how long they would be interested in what goes on in the appellate argument to the if doesnt rivet the attention except perhaps in the cases that have gotten a tremendous amount of publicity. I would see no reason why beyond that concern that th concerned n people shouldnt have access. My view on that is i dont see any problem with having the proceedings televised. I think that it would be good for the public. At this time a vote in favor of the judicial conference of experimenting with television in the courtrooms. That has been carried out. The results of that are being evaluated in the federal system. My particular Appeals Court was not a part of the experiment but not from the unwillingness. Its because they could only have a small number. That is the circumstance in which i think my vote in