We not have that outside distraction, and i am inclined to say i wouldnt want them in the Appellate Court chambers. I think it would be good for the public to see what is going on. I dont know how long they would be interested in what goes on in the appellate argument to the if doesnt rivet the attention except perhaps in the cases that have gotten a tremendous amount of publicity. I would see no reason why beyond that concern that th concerned n people shouldnt have access. My view on that is i dont see any problem with having the proceedings televised. I think that it would be good for the public. At this time a vote in favor of the judicial conference of experimenting with television in the courtrooms. That has been carried out. The results of that are being evaluated in the federal system. My particular Appeals Court was not a part of the experiment but not from the unwillingness. Its because they could only have a small number. That is the circumstance in which i think my vote in
We not have that outside distraction, and i am inclined to say i wouldnt want them in the Appellate Court chambers. I think it would be good for the public to see what is going on. I dont know how long they would be interested in what goes on in the appellate argument to the if doesnt rivet the attention except perhaps in the cases that have gotten a tremendous amount of publicity. I would see no reason why beyond that concern that th concerned n people shouldnt have access. My view on that is i dont see any problem with having the proceedings televised. I think that it would be good for the public. At this time a vote in favor of the judicial conference of experimenting with television in the courtrooms. That has been carried out. The results of that are being evaluated in the federal system. My particular Appeals Court was not a part of the experiment but not from the unwillingness. Its because they could only have a small number. That is the circumstance in which i think my vote in
Environment. We cannot really excise it from the environment, but in the courtroom, i think that the tradition has been that we not have that outside distraction, and i am inclined to say that i would not want them in Appellate Court chambers. It would be good for the American Public to see what is going on there. I dont know how long that would be interested in what goes on in appellate arguments, it tends to be it doesnt rivet your attention perhaps in the cases that have garnered a tremendous amount of publicity, but i see no reason why beyond that concern American People should not have access to the courts. My view on that is, i dont see any problem with having proceedings televised. I think it would be good for the public. At that time, i voted in favor in the judicial conference of experimenting with television in the courtroom. That has been carried out. The results of that are being evaluated in the federal system. My particular Appeals Court was not part of the experiment, bu
Environment. We cannot really excise it from the environment, but in the courtroom, i think that the tradition has been that we not have that outside distraction, and i am inclined to say that i would not want them in Appellate Court chambers. It would be good for the American Public to see what is going on there. I dont know how long that would be interested in what goes on in appellate arguments, it tends to be it doesnt rivet your attention perhaps in the cases that have garnered a tremendous amount of publicity, but i see no reason why beyond that concern American People should not have access to the courts. My view on that is, i dont see any problem with having proceedings televised. I think it would be good for the public. At that time, i voted in favor in the judicial conference of experimenting with television in the courtroom. That has been carried out. The results of that are being evaluated in the federal system. My particular Appeals Court was not part of the experiment, bu
We cannot really excise it from the environment. But in the courtroom, i think has been thattion we not have that outside distraction. That iclined to say uld not want them in Appellate Court chambers. It would be good for the American Public to see what is going on in there. I do not know how long they would be interested in what goes on in appellate argument. Not so it does not rivet your attention, except perhaps the cases that have amount ofremendous publicity. But i see no reason why the American Public should not have access to the court. My view on that is i do not see any problem with having proceedings televised. I think it would be good for the public. Inat that time, i voted favor, in the judicial conference, of experiencing with television in the courtroom. That has been carried out. The results of that are being evaluated. In the federal system. Particular Appeals Court was not part of the experiment, but not one of willingness, because they can only have a small number to