During the meeting. The ring of a cell phone, pagers and similar soundproducing Electronic Devices are prohibited. Please be advise the chair may order of removal from the meeting room of any persons responsible for the ringing of or use of a cell phone, pager or other similar soundproducing electronic device. C, announcement of time allotment for Public Comments. A member of the public has three minutes to make comments on each agenda item unless the Commission Adopts a shorter period. That is strongly recommended that members of the public who wish to address the commission fill out a speaker card and submit the card to the secretary. The next order of business is item 3, report on actions taken at a previous closed session meeting if any. There are no reportable actions. The next action of business is item the next order of business is matters of unfinished business. There are no matters of unfinished business. The next order of business is item 5, matters of new business consisting
As i read this, thats what these words mean. I agree. Might want to go back and talk to whoever at public works drafted it. I agree. Its in the ordinance . Yeah, i mean so. Anyway. Probably none of that matters. The ordinance is different. So why is the language different between these two things brad, our City Attorney . I cant say why its different but there is an ordinance that has the same restriction its just worded differently. It says the prohicks set forth in section 4 shall on prohibition set forth in section 4 shall only apply if it has. Its hard to hear you. The code provides weve been looking at the order on mobile food facilities which is very similar to the code. The code provides the prohibition set forth in subsection 4 which is a 75set radius provision shall only apply if a restaurant has direct street access to its primary access. Very similar. The problem is the ordinance doesnt make sense. A restaurant cant have street access to its own entrance. What it means is do
Every single day is something thats admirable and i want us to really appreciate the folks who are part of, you know, our mental teams and our nonprofit organizations and our homeless out reach workers and even Law Enforcement and the work that were out there doing to help change and save peoples lives. This is the first of many steps that we plan to take and, again, this is, i know, a very complex issue. Its not wraped in the usual political package that the press, i know, wants to see it wrapped in. But this is actually what we need to do. Get into the nuts and bolts, make the right decisions and get out there and make the changes that will help impact the people that we are here to serve. So thank you all so much for being here today. And dr. Colfax and dr. S blanlz dr. Bland will be here to answer any further questions that you might have. Thank you. We spoke with people regardless of what they are. That is when you see change. That is a lead vannin advantage. So Law Enforcement as
Fellow friends, hundreds of other legitimate, certified massage therapist providing Wonderful Service in San Francisco have to dig into some savings accounts that we may or may not have for thousands of dollars of fees to pay for a Health Permit that we had no idea was necessary, number one, and number two, i kind of want to have a reeducation about who we are. This may be an issue for the city and for the nation as a whole, but why is the Health Department going after california certified massage therapists who have Business Licenses and who are doing business in the city. I am my only breadwinner, this is my business, this is my livelihood. I am asking for knowledge about that and maybe for the commissioners reflection on what it would feel like to get a letter to say dont come to work tomorrow, no paycheque, thousands of dollars of fees for you to pay before you can go back to work, if you can go back to work. And the most expensive city in the united states. Thank you. Good afterno
The county department of social services sent some money over to the department of aging saying, how about you help with targeting folks 60 and over. And do an allocation base throughout the state and come up with 66,000 which comes down to us, which is to be used to target older adults, 60 and over , solely recognizing that six a 6,000, and the grand scheme, is not the largest amount of money, but we hope to at least cover some staff time to support the much larger coordinated effort. One other question, what would you see as being successful at the end of the day if we were able to in role tenth out able to unroll 10,000 . They are asking us to meet a couple of targets with these funds, and their two categories. There is an outreach category, how many people do we send this information to . That is usually calculated as an estimate. The numbers are asking us to meet on that level within the thousands. Theres also someone asking us to actually track the amount of applications which ar