Washington. A fox news alert. A massive hurricane that could be the most destructive in the history of the country is about to slam into florida. Hurricane milton could make landfall as early as 8 00 p. M. Eastern, exactly one hour from now. Now, the national Weather Service says the window to evacuate has closed. Shelter in place now. Tampa, Fort Myers and orlando are all expected to face lifethreatening impacts. Tornadoes have already been seen and many of floridas West Coast beaches are at risk as well of being wiped out. Now, first responders in st. Petersburg have paused all operations. Not responding to any emergencies until it is safe to do so. We will bring you conch from across the state but, first, we start in Brayden Ton Florida where Fox Weather Robert ray is standing by, robert . Yeah. Laura, good evening to you. And you see the Manatee River behind me that is raging with up to 80 mileperhour winds that have occurred here in this part of the Gulf Coast. We are not too far
Just ahead. Calling for the attorney general to release transcripts of the we need you to be baking ready for battle. Grand jury proceedings. We count on you. Amy Coney Barrett heads to if you could Say Something to the attorney general, what would what are the doctors telling you capitol hill this week. About your recovery . Yeah. It be . I mean, first i just want to republicans looking to fast we feel lied to. Stop for a second and thank all reporter the grand jury the doctors and First Responders track her confirmation. Democrats resisting but one and everybody who helped me. Leading senator announcing indicted former officer Brent Hankison for firing shots that theyre powerless to stop it. Went into a neighboring you appreciate them but when the aftermath. Police body camera video emerges push really comes to shove, you see what a miracle worker they showing what happened in the apartment. His lawyer says he intends to moments following that deadly raid on Breonna Taylors plead not
Starting to taper off. Most of the day is dry. Mike, a lot of people. Light volume around the bay getting people where they need. Not really any concerns. Ive seen roadside fires. No lanes blocked and no injuries. These typically happen when its colder. There is still traffic out there. The san mateo bridge, we have a good stream westbound and eastbound over into hayward. Right back to you. Thanks so much, mike. 6 01. Our team is covering the impact from the pandemic and what is now the statewide shutdown. First to today in the bays Sharon Katsuda live in concord this morning with details on Governor Newsoms new order. And really this alarming warning that prompted it, sharon. Reporter take a look, here at highway 4, theres still a pretty steady pretty light traffic but it is steady out here. Heading to essential work. We have been sheltering in place. Now this new order affects 40 Million People statewide. During his evening News Conference Governor Newsom shared a sobering statistic
As i read this, thats what these words mean. I agree. Might want to go back and talk to whoever at public works drafted it. I agree. Its in the ordinance . Yeah, i mean so. Anyway. Probably none of that matters. The ordinance is different. So why is the language different between these two things brad, our City Attorney . I cant say why its different but there is an ordinance that has the same restriction its just worded differently. It says the prohicks set forth in section 4 shall on prohibition set forth in section 4 shall only apply if it has. Its hard to hear you. The code provides weve been looking at the order on mobile food facilities which is very similar to the code. The code provides the prohibition set forth in subsection 4 which is a 75set radius provision shall only apply if a restaurant has direct street access to its primary access. Very similar. The problem is the ordinance doesnt make sense. A restaurant cant have street access to its own entrance. What it means is do
As i read this, thats what these words mean. I agree. Might want to go back and talk to whoever at public works drafted it. I agree. Its in the ordinance . Yeah, i mean so. Anyway. Probably none of that matters. The ordinance is different. So why is the language different between these two things brad, our City Attorney . I cant say why its different but there is an ordinance that has the same restriction its just worded differently. It says the prohicks set forth in section 4 shall on prohibition set forth in section 4 shall only apply if it has. Its hard to hear you. The code provides weve been looking at the order on mobile food facilities which is very similar to the code. The code provides the prohibition set forth in subsection 4 which is a 75set radius provision shall only apply if a restaurant has direct street access to its primary access. Very similar. The problem is the ordinance doesnt make sense. A restaurant cant have street access to its own entrance. What it means is do