Not understood] the mitigation effort by sfpd, then how are we implementing measures as approved by them . Sarah jones, Environmental Review officer. Ill respond to this. First i want to state that this communication was not we were never party to any of this email communication. So, we really cant speak to the content of it or the aspects of it. What we can speak to is the mitigation measure itself. Sfrpd is obligated to provide the various options for in the event the [speaker not understood] are found, sfrpd is obligated, number one, to provide that, the results of that reporting and study to u. S. Fish and wildlife as would be expected in a situation where special status species are affected. Sfrpd is required to submit that and fish and wildlife is to be given the opportunity to review and comment. The specific lines as approved by sfrpd would indicate well what thats referring to is fish and wildlife may comment on ~ which option sfrpd is proposing to use for remediation. So, if
New environment enhancements proposed for the california garden snake and the red legged frog who for the past 60 years or so have all lived together in harmony. I urge you to respectfully [inaudible]. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Next speaker. Good evening, supervisors, my name is mike waloch. Im a 30year resident of San Francisco, [speaker not understood], being represented by president chiu. My [speaker not understood], frequent patron of the San Francisco muni courses and im here in support of the sharp park safety infrastructure and Habitat Enhancement project. I closely followed the sharp park controversy over the last five years. I want to share a couple observations. One thing ive learned in this controversy is what the best science tells us, and that meant the california red legged frog is doing absolutely fine coexisting with the course. I dont have time to read the extra quotes that you probably already are familiar with, but ive got it here on the presentation
How does that work . Yes, it did in the form of our biological opinion. So, essentially the measures that were spelled out in the 2009 Compliance Plan were then forwarded to the fish and Wildlife Service for their evaluation during the, the biological opinion of 2012. Do you have any fear that if you dont do Environmental Review in this case that you might end up in a situation where youre once again found in violation . ~ by the feds . Well, we are under obligation to meet these measures that are spelled out in our permit and in the biological opinion. So, we have been working very hard to meet those measures. And we would like to be a good partner with fish and Wildlife Service and implement those measures in a timely way, according to the spelled out deadline. Kay, thank you. If i could followup on that. I wanted to ask questions around the lawsuit a couple years ago. My understanding was the environmental groups brought that, wanted to make sure there were appropriate mitigations f
They need an environmental report, a complete environmental report. Probably you all know that these are going to take at least a year, more likely longer, up to two years to complete the Environmental Impact report. Its just another tactic, there will be another one to follow that. Dont fall for this. This is going to resolve it because its never going to be resolved. The city staffers have worked hard. You hired them to be experts on this and they have presented their expertise here tonight and i hope that you will adopt the proposal of the report of the Planning Commission and accept this Environmental Mitigation because is going to move forward and its going to [inaudible]. Good evening, supervisors. My name is [speaker not understood], lifelong San Francisco resident. I was born in supervisor mars drifted. I lived in supervisor farrells district and i now live in supervisor yees district. Im the cofounder of the San Francisco public graph alliance and our 6,000 members fully suppo
As approved by u. S. Fws and cdfw. So, it doesnt list it as an option. Says shall implement as approved by. ~ it says so if it is uswf is saying they dont have the capacity, Staffing Resources to [speaker not understood] the mitigation effort by sfpd, then how are we implementing measures as approved by them . Sarah jones, Environmental Review officer. Ill respond to this. First i want to state that this communication was not we were never party to any of this email communication. So, we really cant speak to the content of it or the aspects of it. What we can speak to is the mitigation measure itself. Sfrpd is obligated to provide the various options for in the event the [speaker not understood] are found, sfrpd is obligated, number one, to provide that, the results of that reporting and study to u. S. Fish and wildlife as would be expected in a situation where special status species are affected. Sfrpd is required to submit that and fish and wildlife is to be given the opportunity to