New environment enhancements proposed for the california garden snake and the red legged frog who for the past 60 years or so have all lived together in harmony. I urge you to respectfully [inaudible]. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Next speaker. Good evening, supervisors, my name is mike waloch. Im a 30year resident of San Francisco, [speaker not understood], being represented by president chiu. My [speaker not understood], frequent patron of the San Francisco muni courses and im here in support of the sharp park safety infrastructure and Habitat Enhancement project. I closely followed the sharp park controversy over the last five years. I want to share a couple observations. One thing ive learned in this controversy is what the best science tells us, and that meant the california red legged frog is doing absolutely fine coexisting with the course. I dont have time to read the extra quotes that you probably already are familiar with, but ive got it here on the presentation
They need an environmental report, a complete environmental report. Probably you all know that these are going to take at least a year, more likely longer, up to two years to complete the Environmental Impact report. Its just another tactic, there will be another one to follow that. Dont fall for this. This is going to resolve it because its never going to be resolved. The city staffers have worked hard. You hired them to be experts on this and they have presented their expertise here tonight and i hope that you will adopt the proposal of the report of the Planning Commission and accept this Environmental Mitigation because is going to move forward and its going to [inaudible]. Good evening, supervisors. My name is [speaker not understood], lifelong San Francisco resident. I was born in supervisor mars drifted. I lived in supervisor farrells district and i now live in supervisor yees district. Im the cofounder of the San Francisco public graph alliance and our 6,000 members fully suppo
But he kept going and hes taken bite after bite of the apple. They concluded that commission and the appealed that [speaker not understood] at the golfers report. The lawsuit was dismissed on the motion for summary judgment. He lost that lawsuit. Now theyre trying to say that they need an environmental report, a complete environmental report. Probably you all know that these are going to take at least a year, more likely longer, up to two years to complete the Environmental Impact report. Its just another tactic, there will be another one to follow that. Dont fall for this. This is going to resolve it because its never going to be resolved. The city staffers have worked hard. You hired them to be experts on this and they have presented their expertise here tonight and i hope that you will adopt the proposal of the report of the Planning Commission and accept this Environmental Mitigation because is going to move forward and its going to [inaudible]. Good evening, supervisors. My name i
[speaker not understood] take that starting balance and allocate it for each of the two fiscal years. Does that include where we allocated when we send the Budget Stabilization reserve, [speaker not understood] fund balance . Thats right. So, current year [speaker not understood]. Right. So, we have 116 million available. Much of that is going to be counted for next fiscal year. 72 million of current revenue. And in the next slide well show you exactly what sources that 72 million comes from. Baseline contributions, that is, we have to pay 9. 5 million to get to our base lines. Department of operations, if you take all of the revenue, gains and losses, all the expenditures, deficits and surpluses, we end up with a net of almost 19 million short. The pending supplementals, both approved and pending before the board of supervisors amount to 6. 4 million to the general fund. And then the use of the general re serve of 32. 2 million. We are assuming you will need to use all of that reserve
Care. Do he they want to be a dph client, do they want to go somewhere else. There is a lot of uncertainty around that. The governor has made proposals about potentially shifting those responsibilities entirely to the counties which would have significant and significant costs and operational issues if that were to happen. Finally, this projection does not make any assumptions about any current Year Supplemental appropriations. So, based on the actions of the board thus far, we have the Domestic Violence supplemental which is about 1. 9 million in annualized costs and the supplemental that we discussed today, the state supplemental. Together those would add approximately 7. 7 million to the shortfall. People always want to know where have we been and how do the targets or the instructions that the mayor have given compare in prior years. This table lays that out. Youll recall that 200910 was a really banner year for us in terms of shortfalls. We projected a 5 76 million deficit. I thin