Not understood] the mitigation effort by sfpd, then how are we implementing measures as approved by them . Sarah jones, Environmental Review officer. Ill respond to this. First i want to state that this communication was not we were never party to any of this email communication. So, we really cant speak to the content of it or the aspects of it. What we can speak to is the mitigation measure itself. Sfrpd is obligated to provide the various options for in the event the [speaker not understood] are found, sfrpd is obligated, number one, to provide that, the results of that reporting and study to u. S. Fish and wildlife as would be expected in a situation where special status species are affected. Sfrpd is required to submit that and fish and wildlife is to be given the opportunity to review and comment. The specific lines as approved by sfrpd would indicate well what thats referring to is fish and wildlife may comment on ~ which option sfrpd is proposing to use for remediation. So, if
How does that work . Yes, it did in the form of our biological opinion. So, essentially the measures that were spelled out in the 2009 Compliance Plan were then forwarded to the fish and Wildlife Service for their evaluation during the, the biological opinion of 2012. Do you have any fear that if you dont do Environmental Review in this case that you might end up in a situation where youre once again found in violation . ~ by the feds . Well, we are under obligation to meet these measures that are spelled out in our permit and in the biological opinion. So, we have been working very hard to meet those measures. And we would like to be a good partner with fish and Wildlife Service and implement those measures in a timely way, according to the spelled out deadline. Kay, thank you. If i could followup on that. I wanted to ask questions around the lawsuit a couple years ago. My understanding was the environmental groups brought that, wanted to make sure there were appropriate mitigations f
As approved by u. S. Fws and cdfw. So, it doesnt list it as an option. Says shall implement as approved by. ~ it says so if it is uswf is saying they dont have the capacity, Staffing Resources to [speaker not understood] the mitigation effort by sfpd, then how are we implementing measures as approved by them . Sarah jones, Environmental Review officer. Ill respond to this. First i want to state that this communication was not we were never party to any of this email communication. So, we really cant speak to the content of it or the aspects of it. What we can speak to is the mitigation measure itself. Sfrpd is obligated to provide the various options for in the event the [speaker not understood] are found, sfrpd is obligated, number one, to provide that, the results of that reporting and study to u. S. Fish and wildlife as would be expected in a situation where special status species are affected. Sfrpd is required to submit that and fish and wildlife is to be given the opportunity to