couldn t make us do. this is not only unconstitutional, i think it s immoral. you have to understand that what he is doing is a radical attempt to consolidate power in one person. something that not even king george or uncle joe stalin would have dreamed of doing. judge jeanine: the government has certain powers when there is a pandemic. in the 1905 days, did they alloy the state to do it versus the federal government? is there a difference there? absolutely. the state s created the federal government. the federal government didn t create the states. when it came to public health and welfare those are supposed
this is not only unconstitutional, i think it s immoral. you have to understand that what he is doing is a radical attempt to consolidate power in one person. something that not even king george or uncle joe stalin would have dreamed of doing. judge jeanine: the government has certain powers when there is a pandemic. in the 1905 days, did they alloy the state to do it versus the federal government? is there a difference there? absolutely. the state s created the federal government. the federal government didn t create the states. when it came to public health and welfare those are supposed to be left to the states.
in fact, somebody said in this tweet we are going to show here, they claimed you had a, quote, hissy foet over people not wanting to forced to taking an injection. how are you responding? i point out the facts. the supreme court decided that vaccine mandates are legal a long time ago, 1905, guys, this was sustained recently when they refused to receive a case from indiana, i believe it was. so this is a settled constitutional question. vaccine mandates are constitutional and they are allowed and it s time to get over this. you know, you are not the only member of the gop moderate frustrated with the party. we just saw congressman anthony gonzalez says he won t be running again after former president trump enforced his opponent and, of course, trump said he responded with, quote, one down, nine to go, referencing the gop members who voted to impeach him.
corporations, there will be lawsuits. no question this would end up probably in the supreme court. you were right in the previous segment. the disparity within the mandate that people in the united states working for big corporations have to get vaccinated or get a test. but illegal immigrants don t. that s a head scratcher. john: yeah. apparently, people who come across the border illegally are offered the vaccine but it s not a mandate. they don t have to take it. chris: right. i have done a little research. there hasn t been a case quite like this. but the supreme court has ruled on the side of public agencies. there was a supreme court case in 1905 where the court said cambridge, massachusetts could
very sound basic obligation that we have to the citizens that we serve. but there are some potential exemptions for the people with medical situations and for those with sincere religious objections is, and we will see if those can be accommodated. some of those may have been accommodate and some may not be accommodated in which case we will have other folks to be replaced in public service. we hope that everybody is going to strive to be vaccinated, because it is an american thing to do, and george washington started this concept in 1775 when he required all of his soldiers to be vaccinated and the constitutional basis of this was affirmed in 1905 in the jaycus decision, and for all of the students, so this is a common decision against the common foe. we can only defeat this common foe by common action.