Live Breaking News & Updates on முத்திரை வழக்கு

Stay updated with breaking news from முத்திரை வழக்கு. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Amazon's win over Polo Club: a fundamental mistake?


Amazon’s win over Polo Club: a fundamental mistake?
19-02-2021
27-04-2017
The English High Court has found in favour of Amazon in a dispute over the sale and visibility of goods in the UK/EU territory. The ruling is a worrying one which could lead to an upheaval in trademark litigation, argues Aaron Wood of Blaser Mills.
In the judgment handed down in
Lifestyle Equities CV & Anor v Amazon UK Services on January 27, 2020 the English High Court found in favour of Amazon, concluding that the Amazon.com website did not “target” the UK.
The court also held that sales through the website could not be prevented by the brand owner. ....

United Kingdom , Jonathan Weiss Shutterstock , Aaron Woods , English High Court , Polo Club , Lifestyle Equities , Amazon United Kingdom Services , Blaser Mills , Trademark Litigation , Brand Owner , ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் , ஆரோன் வூட்ஸ் , ஆங்கிலம் உயர் நீதிமன்றம் , போளோ சங்கம் , வாழ்க்கை பங்குகள் , அமேசான் ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் சேவைகள் , பிளேஸர் ஆலைகள் , முத்திரை வழக்கு , பிராண்ட் ஓநர் ,

New Balance wins massive trademark case against Chinese brand New Barlun


New Balance wins massive trademark case against Chinese brand New Barlun
Details
10 February 2021
Yes, there s a Chinese sportswear brand called New Barlun. Yes, it would be easy to confuse their logo and product design with the American sportswear brand New Balance. And yes, a court in China felt the same way, awarding a landmark trademark victory to New Balance in the sum of about US$3.85 million (RMB 25 million)  in damages.
The Shanghai Huangpu District Court ruled that defendants New Barlun (China) Co and Shanghai Shiyi Trade Co violated New Balance s trademark rights, as their shoes marked with a similar N logo were both visually and conceptually similar to the American brand. Additionally, the defendants had been acting in bad faith by not following a previous interim injunction to cease production, all while benefitting from the similarity and New Balance s reputation abroad. ....

United States , Dan Mckinnon , Shanghai Lusha Fashion Co , Barlun China Co , Shanghai Huangpu District Court , Shanghai Shiyi Trade Co , Shanghai Pudong District Court , New Balance , New Barlun , Trademark Case , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , டான் மகிநொந் , புதியது சமநிலை , முத்திரை வழக்கு ,

Year In Review – Key Trademark Cases From 2020 - Intellectual Property


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
While 2019 was historic in terms of the changes it brought to
Canadian trademark law, 2020 was unprecedented, bringing the world
together in a common quest to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet,
despite considerable turmoil and disruption, Canadian trademark
practitioners remained resilient and active. Many of the amendments
to the Canadian
Trademarks Act, implemented in 2019,
received considerable attention and review by the Examination
Section of the Trademarks Office as well as the Opposition Board.
In addition, the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal provided
valuable guidance in several noteworthy decisions. The following ....

New York , United States , New Zealand , Republic Of , Justice Fuhrer , Miller Thomson , Justice Kane , Justice Mcveigh , Justice Mactavish , Kane Pentastar , Justice Pentney , Services Manual , Vavilov The Federal Court , Quality Program Services Inc , Diageo North America Inc , Property Office Goods , Section Of The Trademarks Office , Wellness Society , Energizer Brands , Obsidian Group Inc , Ontario Energy , Gillette Company , Foods Ltd , International Ltd , Hilton Worldwide Holding , Travelway Group International Ltd ,