whatsoever. okay. thank you. it sound like they re bringing in the jury right now. the jury is coming in and getting situated and then we are waiting. joey, are we going to hear guilty or not guilty? are we going to hear that? this is a civil trial. it s assessed in terms of liability or not liable. liable or not liable. if you re liable you get to the issue of damages which are monetary. if not liable, there s nothing further to discuss. whether amber heard is liable or not liable. first johnny, are you defaming johnny depp and is johnny depp liable to amber heard. the standard of proof is not reasonable doubt. it s a preponderance of the evidence meaning is more likely or not. let s go back into the courtroom. can i have the attorneys roach for a moment. they re discussing something, and we done know what it is, and that s why they do it at side bar. i just want to mention there are seven members on this jury. it s not like a criminal trial. we know that there a
kevin is live in d.c. president biden is in a far more favorable light. in the latest fox survey, somehow this continues to manage a 40% approval rating. give or take 3 or 3 percentage points. but that still means his disapproval numbers are not very good. they re hovering around 660. obviously, that s nothing to write home about. meantime i m 78% of voters believe the economy is in poor or fair condition, while now over the war in israel. but your thoughts on the numbers overall? i think, you know, there s probably no disputing that people think democrats handle those issues better. the problem is that most voters don t vote based on those issues. i mean, abortion arguably has driven some suburban women towards, you know, voting for republican for democrats when they might otherwise vote for republicans. but i don t think there s many single issue voters on transgenderism, on climate change. i mean, those rank very low when you compare it to concerns about the economy, co
New Delhi [India], November 22 (ANI/ATK): Massive bearish trends often place spot and futures market traders in a fix regarding which coin to invest in and whether to go long or short.
the statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than mr. depp, answer, yes. do you find that mr. depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that ms. heard acted without actual malice? answer, yes. 3, as to the statement appearing in the op-ed entitled a transformative moment for women in the washington post print edition and the online op-ed amber heard i spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture s wrath. that is to change in the washington post online edition, quote, i had the rare vantage point of seeing in realtime how institutions protect men accused of abuse end quote. do you find that mr. depp has proven all the elements of
greater weight of the evidence that question mr. waldman while acting as an agent for mr. depp made or published this statement? answer, yes. question, the statement was about ms. heard? answer, yes. question, the statement was seen by someone other than ms. heard? answer, yes. question, the statement was false? answer, yes. do you find that ms. heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by mr. waldman was made with actual malice? answer, yes. 3, as to this statement appearing in the april 27th, 2020, online edition of the daily mail quote, we ve reached the beginning of the end of ms. heard s abuse hoax against johnny depp end quote. do you find that ms. heard has proven all the elements of defamation?