strong. it makes us americans. that s worth celebrating. and that s what i#;#vày want, nt house republicans but all of us as americans to remember. thanks very minute. a somewhat pet hunt president obama there at the rose garden ceremony, announcing because the house has told him there will be no vote on immigration reform this year, he intends to do whatever he can to try to get something done regarding the situation on the border. wendell goaler goler is still there. the president blasted john boehner and the republicans in the house. what s their answer? they re going to be frustrated that once again the president is attempting to go around congress. this, of course, coming on the heels of last friday s supreme
some play here that we could actually create a government in baghdad that was a national unity government. and right now the maliki enterprise isn t any of those three things. i don t think it s a high-probability shot. and chris, if maliki continues in government, it s a zero-probability shot. i know what wendell said about our not insisting that maliki go, but frankly, i can t see this happening at all if he remains in power based on his track record. in your scenario, isis ends up holding on to a big chunk of western and northern iraq that you call sunnistan. do we just sit by and let this group, which al qaeda says is too violent for them, create a state in the middle of the middle east, in the center of the middle east and a base of operations for terror attacks? no, no.
of the obama administration s goal of prosecuting terror suspects in civilian courts. wendell, thanks for that. now let s bring in the former director of the cia and nsa, general michael hayden. general, welcome back to fox news sunday. good morning, chris. let s start where wendell goaler finished with katallah. he was captured about two weeks ago. of course, the one suspect we have in custody in the benghazi terror attack case. there were some who thought that the u.s. would take some time on that ship bringing him back to the u.s., bringing him back into the legal system while they could conduct a more robust interrogation. are you surprised that he was brought back and put into the legal system so quickly and was that a mistake? i m a little surprised. i thought they would take longer and press accounts this morning, chris, said that he is continuing to withhold
continued to move quickly this week. the extremist group isis has seized more territory in western iraq. president obama announced he ll ask congress for $500 million to train and arm syrian rebels. and both sunni and shiite leaders are trying to force iraqi prime minister maliki from power. joining us now with the latest, fox news senior white house and foreign affairs correspondent wendell goaler. wendell? chris, the president is very reluctantly boosting u.s. military aid to iraq on the condition, he says, that nuri al maliki boosts a government that invites the kurds and sunnis to join in. the officials here feel maliki is a big part of the problem. his alienation of sunnis has led many to support the terrorist group isis as an alternative to the iraqi government. even former iraqi military leaders who served under saddam hussein are now fighting against the government, which is part of
was wrong, that there s still some play here that we could actually create a government in baghdad that was a national unity government. and right now the maliki enterprise isn t any of those three things. i don t think it s a high-probability shot. and chris, if maliki continues in government, it s a zero-probability shot. i know what wendell said about our not insisting that maliki go, but frankly, i can t see this happening at all if he remains in power based on his track record. in your scenario, isis ends up holding on to a big chunk of western and northern iraq that you call sunnistan. do we just sit by and let this group, which al qaeda says is too violent for them, create a state in the middle of the middle east, in the center of the middle east and a base of operations for terror attacks? no, no.