Live Breaking News & Updates on Wasnt Surprising|Page 3
Stay updated with breaking news from Wasnt surprising. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Kyiv while this entire process was playing out. and everybody knew it. the ukrainians knew it, trump knew it, rudy knew it. there was no mystery to this. and remember part of the reason there s such a sort of robust conversation about whether or not to expand the number of witnesses testifying before the impeachment inquiry is that we haven t actually heard from people who were really, really in the weeds with rudy himself on the work he was doing for the president. lev parnas is a person who would potentially be able to provide that testimony. andriy yermak told me on the record that lev parnas was at the table when he is rudy had a conversation that is now proven to be incredibly fateful. parnas hasn t yet testified, so there s a lot of information out there that congressional democrats still don t have. that is great point.as as for rudy, swin, to betsy s ....
Industry. is it? yes. and everyone likes to tell their boss i found great stuff. well, what they want to hear. and the more information you learn the more worried you get as essentially citizens or people and not in the context of the the profile that you have as a business proposition. the title of the book alludes to an act of citizenship, not a judge and you re role we ve assigned ourselves to actually adjudicate these matters. what we re saying is, you know, the equivalent is you re on your way to work and you see, you know, someone robbing someone, you call the appropriate authorities to investigate and intervene. that s what we did. i should be clear that s what chris did. he s the intelligence professional. we re former journalists, right? we defer to him and his judgment, and he thought it was of such import that he had to do something about it. right. what we said, if you in your professional judgement think this really is going to be a digital pearl harbor ....
I understand it, i respect it. but if that s the situation in which they found themselves and they simply could not in good faith abide a presidential order, then you have to knit. and that s what they did. i d like to know more about it, but it seems right to me. i d like to know more as well. i want to bring in now a pair of reporters from the daily beast and politics reporter betsey woodr woodruff swan. a bunch of things happening right now in terms of developments. there has always been the assumption that when gordon sondland calls trump just a day or two before the aid is released and i want nothing, i want no quid pro quo, he was saying that because he knew he was being accused of precisely that because he knew about the whistle-blower complaint. tonight the new york times establishes that in reporting he did in fact know when that call happened and when the aid was ....
Order, then you have to quit. and that s what they did. i d like to know more about it, but it seems right to me. i d like to know more as well. w thank you both for being with me. i want to bring in now a pair of reporters from the daily beast and politics reporter betsey woodruff swan.ti a bunch of things happening right now in terms of a few developments. i want to talk about the times story first, betsy. there has always been the assumption that when gordon sondland calls trump just a day or two before the aid is on released and trump is, quote, in a bad mood and barks, i want nothing, i want nothing, i want no quid pro quo, he was saying that because he knew he was being accused of precisely that because he knew about the whistle-blower complaint. tonight the new york times establishes that in reporting he did in fact know when that call happened and when the aid was released. how significant do you think this is? it s significant because it firms up somewhere where people ....
Without knowing absolutely for sure what was going on. when the president said i want nothing, no quid pro quo, it certainly sounded like a classic example of someone protesting too much and someone using a term they had heard somebody else use. of course it was widely observed trump sort of asserting affirmatively that he didn t want a quid pro quo really wouldn t make sense in the course of the conversation sondland described unless the president himself knew that he was facing allegations of having engaged in that kind of a behavior. and the new york times story basically firms up the assumption that a lot of folks had been making, which is that he knew what was going on when m he went into that conversation h with the eu ambassador. swin, there s sort of documentsre coming out from internal white house review from the omb aid being held up, some questions about when it was held up.p, it does strike me as significant you actually had people in omb who apparently resigned over it ....