Stay updated with breaking news from Visa v. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
he emerged today, of course, refusing to take any questionse to defend his department s actions. visa v former president.ia my role is completelysp consistenteak on with regulatios that set forth the responsibilities of , e attorney general underco the special counsel regulations, and i followed thos te regulations. lau look, let sra be very clear here. the issue is are you acting in good faith or? are you part of a political operation to get a conviction 81% mp by any means necessary? 81% of republicans believeof reb about all you know. this is all about politics and protecting one of the more destructivvee presidentsha the united states has ever had. joe biden. and they rjoe bide e now consider the situation this way. no one believes that merrick garland would still be a a.g. if he didn t hadn t greenlitlig a special prosecutor. this case, everyone at msnbc and cnn believes that garland tu is trying to put trump in jailt. no matter where the facts lead. otherwis ....
Julie cavalcante was convicted of first degree murder august 16th for the killing of his former girlfriend in pennsylvania and wanted for another murder in brazil. Now officials are warning residents to be alert and careful. We are requesting that residents in the area of this township remain inside, lock your doors, lock your cars. He is still considered an extremely dangerous individual. We will continue just uncovering every rock until we find him. The very last thing we want to see besides someone getting hurt is him to get into somebodys house. Getting a set of car keys and it is off to the races. Julie lauren green with the latest. The massive manhunt for cavalcante has put a Pennsylvania Community on edge as multiple Law Enforcement agencies are combing through the backyards and by ways, the most promising piece of evidence is that home surveillance video. The ....
He emerged today, of course, refusing to take any questionse to defend his department s actions. visa v former president.ia my role is completelysp consistenteak on with regulatios that set forth the responsibilities of , e attorney general underco the special counsel regulations, and i followed thos te regulations. lau look, let sra be very clear here. the issue is are you acting in good faith or? are you part of a political operation to get a conviction 81% mp by any means necessary? 81% of republicans believeof reb about all you know. this is all about politics and protecting one of the more destructivvee presidentsha the united states has ever had. joe biden. and they rjoe bide e now consider the situation this way. no one believes that merrick garland would still be a a.g. if he didn t hadn t greenlitlig a special prosecutor. this case, everyone at msnbc ....
Of the main probate party were televised bowing collectively in a public apology a probe ageing labor federation blamed kerry lamb for their group s losses in the election that sounds like she is deeply discredited on both sides both visa v hong kong citizens but also these of the ageing itself so what would you expect to be her fate going forward i think her fate to be going forward will be it will be a very difficult situation for her because you ve already framed very good she s in a position where she doesn t get support from any potties. not from the pro-democracy side not from the from camp and not from beijing as well of course beijing says they will support her but she has to listen to carrie lee has to listen to beijing and that s making her very difficult to stay and heroically so ....
both rosenstein and mueller are by the book, professional prosecutors. they re going to do this investigation and his message in that interview was we re going to do this investigation in the right way. there is more reporting about manafort having met nine times with the special counsel s office, more focus on roger stone. what are your expectations for where this goes next? the evidence is pretty clear that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russians. you think there s evidence pretty clear? the evidence is there. whether they have enough of it to bring criminal charges is another issue entirely. likewise with obstruction of justice charges. what we saw in firing comey and the threats to the investigators, in various other actions linked to the white house is the potential obstruction of justice case. is it not absolutely essential, both these cases, vis-a-v vis-a-vis russia and saudi ....