Its saturday august 12th, youre watching velshi. Im Charles Coleman Junior Filling in for my friend ali velshi. We begin this hour with the latest developments in the fastmoving case of the United States versus donald j trump. There are major developments in the Government Election interference case against the former president. Federal judge Tanya Chutkan granted the Special Counsel Team Request for protective order just yesterday. The protective order seek salute what trump can and cannot disclose about the case, and the trove of evidence that prosecutors are set to turn over to the defense during discovery. Now the government requested a protective order that covered all of the discovery materials. But the judges ruling did not go that far. It does stop trump from publicly sharing quote, material that the government doesnt, designates has sensitive. And quote. This would include things like personal information of possible witnesses, recordings, and transcripts of testimony. The def
great thanksgiving. we ve got a couple of great hours on tape for you of some of our recent, top interviews and great discussions. we begin with the new inside account of working in the trump white house from former white house aide cassidy hutchinson, whose testimony before the january 6th committee last year revealed what went on within trump s inner circle leading up to and during the attack on the capitol. as the president had gotten into the vehicle with bobby, he thought they were going up to the capitol. when bobby had relayed to him, we re not, you don t have the assets to do it, it s not secure, we re going back to the west wing, the president had very strong, very angry response to that. tony described him as being irate. the president said something to the effect of, i m the f-ing president. take me up to the capitol now. to which bobby responded, sir, we have to go back to the west wing. the president reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at
Answers at a wrong but feel very ray. it is happening on this level with average recognition. they will get back numbers and say it might be 78% who it is. that is a be, sometimes, right? in class. but you are misidentifying a person. a b is not good enough. you need to be 100%. what we have seen recently is cops police forces of america and also the military of america leaning into a eye practices for things like the border wall. there s something called from the border who started oculus, nothing you put on your face for facebook. he is now in a.i. border security stuff. there is a massive complex around. this it is simply not there yet. it is taking in all the vices, the human biases that feed into these algorithms and are making them even worse. there is also the danger that there is a bias that will exist in the criminal justice
Pattern of racial bias in our justice system and an antique naje. if you years ago a series of studies show just how unjust a.i. recognition is. the 2019 federal study found that asian blind people were up to 100 times more likely to be misidentified by facial recognition tools than white people. middle aged white man and were identified correctly with the highest rates of accuracy. no surprise there. black and indigenous women were identified with the lowest degrees of accuracy by a long shot. also not a surprise. these implications are serious. our justice system is already known to be heavily biased against both black and brown people. with artificial intelligence becoming more and more common in different aspects of modern life, from policing, to medicine, to hiring processes. these prejudices that existed society being programed into algorithms that will be relied on more and more every day,
When it works. it is dangerous wasn t doesn t work. as we saw with the false arrest. when we are thinking about the teams that are creating these systems, we want to have people with a variety of experiences. people who know that black women already have a higher infant mortality rate, ray? this compounds even what it means to put somebody in prison while they re pregnant, which is already bad enough. what we already know about medical treatment of black women, black pregnant people, that is also out on top of this. as we are studying a.i. systems, it is crucial that we also understand the cultural, social, political contacts. you brought up a great example with how jurors could be swayed. there is an app that was introduced that was a facial recognition and biometric