judge jeanine pirro, harold ford jr., jesse watters, and greg gutfeld. it s 5:00 in new york city and this is the five. the 2024 election turning into a free-for-all, maybe. a dozen states could follow colorado in kicking donald trump off their ballots, or at least trying to. now republicans are found to retaliate against joe biden. we should all be encouraged by any action that makes it less likely that he will return to the president. it s a question of law. if a 14-year-old tried to run for president, would that person be kept off of the ballot because the constitution says you have to be 35 years old to run for president? what is the limiting principle for that? why, could we just say biden can be on the ballot because he lead in 8 million illegals into the country and violated the constitution, which he has? maybe we should take joe biden off the ballot in g texas. utfeld california now lookings copy the ballot ban, and a lieutenant governor trying to run
today on the program we ll get the latest live on israel-hamas war. plus the world watches as two major wars, one in the middle east and the other in europe. each one side is heavily funded by uncle sam. it s ukraine s fight against russia that is about to run out of american funding. what does the gop have to do with it? cory shockey and anne applebaum of the atlantic. also french philosopher bernard levee on anti-semitism rearing its ugly head again and former harvard president on racism in america. but first, here s my take. when one thinks of america s greatest strengths, the kind of assets the world looks at with admiration and envy, america s elite universities would long have been at the top of the list, but the american public has been losing faith in these universities for good reason. three university presidents came under fire this week for their vague and indecisive answers when asked whether to call for the genocide of jews would violate their instituti
What weve been discussing w today, which involved in a regular channel, was a request that went against u. S. Policy that have have undermined the rule of law and our longstanding policy goals in ukraine, as in other countries in the postsoviet space. Those policies which were indeed championed by ambassador yovanovitch. You also testified on october 15th in the deposition about fundamental reforms necessary for ukraine to fight corruption and to transform the country. And you t cited the importance reforming certain institutions, notably was investigating President Trumps political opponents a part of those necessary reforms . Was it on that list of yours or indeed was it on any list . No, they werent. In fact, historically, is it not true that a major problem in the ukraine has been its misuse
of prosecutors, precisely to conduct investigation of political opponents. Thats a legacy i dare suggest from the soviet era when, as you stated in your testimony, prosecutors like the kgb were
another after another republican just whining. it is i guess it is their strategy. they understand, especially in places like california, that their policies are just extraordinarily unpopular. they are on the wrong side of so many issues. they are on the wrong side of vaccine mandates. they are on the wrong side of overturning a constitutionally protected right in the state of texas that 70% of americans say they don t want overturned. they are on the wrong side of issue after issue. they are on the wrong side of january 6th. theyor the wrong side of investigating the insurrection. they are on the wrong side of just about everything. so what do they do, katty kay? they, of course, they act like the illiberal leader of hungary. a person a lot of conservatives are praising now. they love the fact that orbat
based on this. this is a the american people see through all this. they understand the facts support the president. theyor understand this process unfair. and they see through the whole darn sham. with that, i yield back.ou mr. welch. thank you. i say to my colleague, i d be glad to have the person who started it all come in and testify. president trump is welcome to take a seat right there.tr [ laughter ] you know, the question here, it s not a dispute about the enormous power that a president has. the question is whether, in this case, there was an abuse of that power.es a president can fire an ambassador for any reason whatsoever. a president can change his policy, as he did when he opened the door for turkey to go in and