hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are arejessica elgot, deputy political editor of the guardian and katy balls, deputy political editor of the spectator. welcome back. let s look at what is in. the metro, which headlines prince philip leaving hospital after 28 days to be reunited with the queen at windsor. an exclusive in the huffington post which says the foreign secretary told officials that britain would seek trade deals with countries that have breached international human rights standards. the financial times follows up on that story which it says have led to accusations from some tory mps that borisjohnson is going soft on china. the vaccine chaos in europe is the top story in the telegraph with brussels blaming eu governments of stockpiling jabs. the guardian headlines the growing pressure on borisjohnson to launch a public inquiry into britain s handling of covid 19. and the mail leads with the con
deputy political attic or menu have been writing today commit including the eye tomorrow. it says johnson s china problem. is that what you are talking about, the politics for the prime minister, or what? , . , what? yes, the politics, the fact that he is against what? yes, the politics, the fact that he is against his what? yes, the politics, the fact that he is against his party - what? yes, the politics, the fact that he is against his party or. what? yes, the politics, the fact that he is against his party or a i that he is against his party or a section that he is against his party or a section of that he is against his party or a section of his party that are quite noisy section of his party that are quite noisy but section of his party that are quite noisy. but also the fact that china is not noisy. but also the fact that china is not the noisy. but also the fact that china is not the soviet union, and the problem is not the soviet union, and the pro
hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are rosa prince, editor of the political magazine, house and rachel cunliffe, deputy online editor at the new statesman. let s take a look at tomorrow s front pages. a tomorrow s front pages. few more titles have comt we a few more titles have come in since we last spoke, but let s kick off again. let s start with the telegraph, and it says there s chaos in the eu as several major european countries halted their roll outs of the oxford astrazeneca jab, over blood clot fears. the same story makes the front page of the daily mail. it says experts are furious at the decision to suspend the oxford covid jab, accusing european leaders of risking lives. the guardian reports that the european medicines regulator has moved to quash concerns about the oxford astrazeneca vaccine, saying the benefits outweigh the risks. british regulators have also rushed to the defence of the jab, as ha
after a year of coronavirus, senior government figures tell say we should have locked down earlier in the autumn. i love you. no, you don t. know, i don t-u and a red carpet of british talent and diversity is among this year s oscar nominations. good evening. germany, italy, and france are among several european countries that have now suspended the use of the oxford astrazeneca covid vaccine. it follows cases of blood clotting reported in some people after having the jab. so, is the astrazeneca vaccine safe? experts here say it is, and the number of blood clots reported after the vaccine are no more than those typically reported within the general population. and the world health organization says there is no evidence of a link between the vaccine and reported blood clots. our medical editor fergus walsh has more. a public display of confidence in the oxford/astrazeneca vaccine from northern ireland chief medical officer today. by contrast, you cannot have the jab in the i
sure the about china and russia, and making sure the uk about china and russia, and making sure the uk can defend itself. but an awful sure the uk can defend itself. but an awful lot of money is involved in this, an awful lot of money is involved in this, i an awful lot of money is involved in this, ithink an awful lot of money is involved in this, i think £10 billion has been recommended for the nuclear warheads. and i think of few eyebrows will be raised by this, wondering if this is the best use of those wondering if this is the best use of those funds. wondering if this is the best use of those funde wondering if this is the best use of those funds- wondering if this is the best use of those funds. also, rosa, looking at a warnin: those funds. also, rosa, looking at a warning by those funds. also, rosa, looking at a warning by 2030 those funds. also, rosa, looking at a warning by 2030 of those funds. also, rosa, looking at a warning by 2030 of a those