latter, wouldn t g you?ut the remarkable thing about musk is that he is someone who is on our side and appreciating the importance of free speech. but he s also a cultural warrior and that s kind of a rare combination because typically it sinat the leftist billionaires who understand the importance of culturale activism and are willing to pute their money even when there aren t big profits to be had.bo i think,ut for example, about when jeff bezos bought the washington post asking price two hundred and fifty$2 billion dollars and he didn t care for him5050. washington it was like i owned the washington post. but normally the conservative billionaires nlly l like, well,s the return? what s the return on thisre journalistic ventureur and so on . but elon musk is looking at it as twitter is of all the social, media platforms, perhaps the most influential in shapingt the cultural agenda. that s why he wants twitter and i think the effect of it is going to be electric. another thing, dinesh
0 this evening. as always, thank you for beingel with you. op makee this show possible. we hope you ll say a dvr so you never miss an episode. i ll be out tomorrow. tammyut bruce will be and i hope you have a great passover and a great easter and never let your heart be troubled. thanks for being with us. er good evening, everyone.th i m laura ingraham and this is the ingraham angle. h tonight we bring you part two of our exclusive with mel gibson and mark wahlberg. you ll hear why they ve turned to making family themedily mov. plus their thoughts on a new trend among some men in hollywood. you don t want to miss it. but first, dems don t t care. that s the focus of tonight s angle. it almost seems vindictive at this point. now a a i m talking about what the party in power isn t inflicting on the united states runaway inflation, devastating family budgets now crime waves terrorizing our cities. the fentanyl explosion killing thousands of americans every month. millions of illegal
the white house right now, what they re concerned about is that these sanctions have been so successful that it might prompt him to lash out in a way that could be very dangerous. he of course is rattling the nuclear sabre. no evidence he s doing anything about that. no equipment has been taken out of storage or anything. but we cannot rule that out. but there are other ways that he could, you know, react in a way that increases or escalates this crisis and drags the west in in a more dangerous way. what if there s an incident at the polish worlder? what if there s a shootdown of a civilian airplane as happened in 2014 when that plane was shot down over ukraine? you can imagine a number of scenarios where this widens beyond ukraine. as you would nlly, you have nato involved and where does that lead? that s the concern in the white house right now. that is the concern, hagar, that the secretary of state will have to address when he goes to the region today. talk about how this fits in
in rank and dishonorably discharged. he entered ft. brag in a uniform by the way. president trump weighed in on twitter while aboard air force one. he said it is a complete and total disgrace to our country and to our military. senator lindsey graham released a statement saying hisdy appointment, given the nature of the crime and sacrifices made by other on bergdahl s behalf, this sentence in my view falls short of the gravity of the offense and independent judiciary is the heart and soul soul of the rule of law but no one is beyond criticism. let s go to nbc s pentagon correspondent, hans nichols, a little earlier with you on the air, barry mccavry called it the perfect scenario to end the saga of bowe bergdahl. that he did walk away but he was captured by the taliban and tortured by the taliban for many years and that was snlly enough