europe that you green-lighted and he will only entertain important questions on chips. have any chips they could put in his head to? just kidding for those of you on the left to have no sense of humor. don t worry, this morning the chief idiot at the white house ron klain, he cleared everything up. take a look. i think it s fair to say the white house has pretty aggressively walked back or clarified whatever you want to call it the president s comments about ukraine and russia and whether the president was signaling a minor incursion might be viewed through a different lens. when the president meant to say that at the time or maybe he was being inarticulate, can you afford any gaffes given the stakes right now? i think the president was quite clear and reiterated his point of view this morning. president putin should have no doubt, any move by the russian assembled military across the border is an invasion. sean: he wasn t clear, he talked about a minor incursion,
and biden will only entertain important questions on chips. every chips that they could put in his a head maybe make themid a little sharper. i don t know. just kidding for those of you on the left that have no sense of humor anyway, don t worryry because this morning the chief idiot at the white house, ron klain, oh , he cleared everything up. ke take a look. i think it s fair to say the white house was prettye aggressively walked back or clarified or whatever you want to callhoho the president s comments about ukraine and russia and whethersi the president was signaling that a minor incursion might be viewed through a different lens, whether the president meant to say that at the time or maybe he was being inarticulate. can you afford any gaffes given the stakes right now in all this ? well, i think the president was quite clear and reiterated his point of view this morning very clearly president putinor should have no doubtni any move by the russianan assembled military across the
they are trying to present surrender as courageous. some act of courage. and i don t think the american people are buying it. bret: there was a hunger, ari, to get troops out. but how we got them out and what we did to get them out was the key part. there is some amazing video today coming out of afghanistan of women, mothers handing over their children over the fence to try to get them into the airport even though they know they can t get there we didn t hear that and there is some of that video right now. we didn t hear that empathy, that emotion, at least not yet from president biden. and this is where he says that chaos was inevitable and he was clear-eyed about the chaos. bret, he wasn t clear eyed he was two faced. he said the confidence in the afghani military. he said they were strong. 300,000. best equipment, best trained. why didn t he say at that time no, this will be chaotic. he didn t level with the
this is another example. i want your impression. is he testing his supporters to see if they believe his tweets or their own lying ears. this is a classic of the donald trump genre. he ll say something that could be interpreted in two ways. he could say she s personally nasty or her comments were nasty. he wasn t clear. instead of owning it he torches anyone who notes it and says he didn t do it in the first place. then people talk past each other as to what he meant. he clearly said it. he was responding to something she had said two and a half years ago that he appeared surprised by. he did use the word nasty. he has a habit of saying that things didn t happen when there isn t audio or video. sometimes he does it when there is. what are the implications of being in a public feud with
doesn t pass the smell test. sandra: he admitted he was the anonymous source to buzz feet. i made a mistake. i did not mean to be cute. was cute as when republicans talk to me about with lying or not lying, let s go back to the element, the meeting supposedly about russian adoptions so now you re out you re talking about lanny davis. at the end of the day, we have a president of the united states, we have all of those around him and that have consistently lied to. sandra: what you think about lanny davis and what s happening here? its secretary. sandra: he is the attorney representing michael cohen. where they repeatedly lied throughout. so yes, we could acknowledge it is wrong for him and his anonymous source but the more critical issue is that they lied throughout this entire effort. they shouldn t be surprising to anybody. the second the michael cohen took a deal, lanny davis began chewing the scenery being very