Showers right here into the hills to the east, this was a shower that was producing some torrential downpours but it is now exiting the bay area. Some heavier rain in the san cruz mountains. This is also moving out and not going to affect us. Things are whining down tonight. After a day where we are seeing heavy rain at times about a third of an inch in the south bay and higher amounts in towards San Francisco and a couple of spot in the hills that got two inches of rain. Here is as live view at sfo still wet out there. Well see a dry day for sunday with a mixture of clouds and sunshine but increasing high clouds in the afternoon and yet another storm system approaches and thatll be here on monday and i will tell you what it will bring. All right, continuing our coverage, dan ruben showing us the rain and the damage it caused. Thats the sound of the ruptured gas line. We were out here having coffee. People who live near the Castro District say a tree that fell on saturday was about 80y
To send most of those to the north. Overlooking the san jose area, well, got some temperatures dropping off now to 49 degrees in san jose, 50 in San Francisco. 43 degrees in livermore. By the afternoon, we are seeing some sunshine and just gorgeous weather. Temperatures up in the 60s even some low 70s in parts of the east and also the south bays. Could get warmer over the weekend too. Well have more on that in a moment. Right now lets check the roads with elizabeth. And back out to oakland all lanes are finally back open on 880 before the 980 interchange northbound. Some of us saw this coming into work. There was a highspeed chase involving a wrongway driver. The driver ended up crashing northbound 880 by the 980 interchange. For a while one lane was blocked but again we just talked with chp and everything is now clear so no delays out of downtown into the macarthur maze. Heres a live look at the san mateo bridge. Westbound 92 at the speed limit out of the east bay heading over the hig
Watt, we have not seen eye to eye on many issues, im hoping that perhaps from a different perspective in the top row on the democratic side of the House Financial Services committee maybe therell be an epiphany about issues, i dont know that to be true. I will comment less on my former colleague and perhaps comment more on his predecessor and that is, rarely will you find a more astute, finer Public Servant than ed demarco, who did incredible work and so without saying anything about mel watt, i think it speaks volumes about the administration and in replacing ed demarco, who was realy and a lot of the path act, frankly is codifying into law a lot of Ground Breaking work that hes done as head of the shfa. So that will be the polite and avote way i avoid your question. Why dont we take another estion, but i want to add to that, ed demarco is a Public Servant who does deserve a lot of applause. Over here on the right. Mr. Chairman, thank you very much. Youve done a great job of standing
Our agency consists, before mr. Madine was concerned, our agency consisted of four parttime members who could work about one day a week with no staff. We were struggleling merely to struggling merely to get it up. We were nowhere near the volume of intake well be at in the future. That was part of it. So as far as youre concerned, nothing was withheld from you. It was you didnt have the a perfect ture to grind through aperture to grind through all the different programs. Literally, senator, we had a beforeg scheduled on 215 the snoweden snowden leaks, and literally the person was hit by a bus the weekend before he was due to brief us and we had to cancel the briefing. He was in a car accident. We have seen no indication there was an effort to withhold information about this program either prior to the disclosures or subsequent to the disclosure. I think we learned the gap is actually on your end in terms of having the capacity to look into the breadth of various programs. I would just
Challenge to the new Source Performance Standards since the passage of the 1977 amendments. Therefore, the court was rprised that Neither Party raised during the discussion below the appropriate standard of law in that discussion. They did not even mention the fact of a new major legislative effort. So even with the best kind of counsel it can happen. Issues spotting is a challenging business. Yes. Even with counsel and without it reliance on a judge is often hazardous. Ive never been a judge but ive litigated for a number of years and ive always been astonished at how cases that ive tried may raise issues on appeal that i thought were nsignificant and sometimes decided by a ruling without an opinion but i think that the reason i propose a constitutional advocate be involved in every decision that she or he thought was significant was to give the court the benefit of that kind of additional insight and guidance and perspective. Im going to turn to my colleague, senator grassley, and th