Stay updated with breaking news from Sbc pacific bell. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
obtain the cigarette and so the owner of this market is claiming that the 25 suspension is too harsh. and that the department we don t agree. first, in order to prevent minors from purchasing tobacco products the burden must be placed on the owner, to train his employees and to make sure that this does not occur. second, the ordinance allows the department to suspend the tobacco retail permit for up to 90 days and for a first time violaters but the department is requiring a 25 day suspension, which is less than 1 third of the allotted suspension time. and finally, well, also, the 25 day suspension will not put the market out of business. and so during that 25 days, he will not be able to sell tobacco products but they will be able to sell everything else, alcohol, snacks, whatever that stor is selling. but the greatest reasons that the department of public health is asking the board to up hold the 25 day suspension is because when the office searched for the schools loc ....
and then, 7 block walk, in addition to those schools, we have sacred heart preparatory with the 1250 student body population and now in the 7 blocks of its market we have over 2,000 students. and that is within a half a mile. and so we are asking you tonight to please up hold our decision to suspend the permit for 25 days and thank you if you have any questions. miss young. yes. we have not seen you for quite a while and your program must be successful. it just to confirm the appellant has indicated or read into his comment that he has indicated that this is the first time for him? yes. this is the first time violation. okay, thank you. i have a question, is an assumption that the store keeper or employee was caught that it might be a more frequent happening at that particular location? i am not sure about that. would i have to talk to the other department but i am not sure if we have the answer to that question. because i am trying to determine whether ....
have sacred heart preparatory with the 1250 student body population and now in the 7 blocks of its market we have over 2,000 students. and that is within a half a mile. and so we are asking you tonight to please up hold our decision to suspend the permit for 25 days and thank you if you have any questions. miss young. yes. we have not seen you for quite a while and your program must be successful. it just to confirm the appellant has indicated or read into his comment that he has indicated that this is the first time for him? yes. this is the first time violation. okay, thank you. i have a question, is an assumption that the store keeper or employee was caught that it might be a more frequent happening at that particular location? i am not sure about that. would i have to talk to the other department but i am not sure if we have the answer to that question. because i am trying to determine whether it was random, or indicative of something else? for the ....
am. delaney. i m back for the trees. what we are asking first is that the previous motion be amended to read that the permit be issued after the final approval, not after the june 5th meeting because that s not the final approval. while it might be and might not be. but after the final planning approval. because we as the citizens around these trees would like them there as long as possible. it s not clear dha this project will actually get through. so how do we know this? we would like these trees to stay as long as possible within our community. most of the people in fact all the people who live around there work and can t come for various reasons. all of them are passionate, you have received letters. i would like to give you a little bit of education and this is for commissioner hwang, you had many questions. i m going to read to you from donald bald key from the nursery on trees and i have asked for this so going forward you have this information. as a rule trees s ....
primary box. so ultimately at&t would have to apply for an excavation permit to trench the conduit to context the 2 boxes. that would be a normal excavation permit which will issue which still maybe appealable to this appellate body. that s something different in this case. the issue as i understand is not the excavation itself, it s the placement, the ultimate placement, right? and being in the public right-of-way versus on some separately privately negotiated agreement to have it on someone s private property, right? for this specific permit, you are correct, commissioner. what happens is there is a preapproval of the siting of this box as a preoccurs or and the excavation permit is the trigger for any appeals. sure, i get that, okay. thank you, is there any public comment on this item? okay, seeing none, we ll start with our rebuttal. you have 3 minutes, mr. hillegas. well, i think i would just repeat what i said before. i think it s clear that property own ....