possible of a 60 box size. permit holder: richard price. project: approval to remove six 66 existing trees and plant nine 99 item we will start with the requester. good afternoon, commissioners, you know who i am. delaney. i m back for the trees. what we are asking first is that the previous motion be amended to read that the permit be issued after the final approval, not after the june 5th meeting because that s not the final approval. while it might be and might not be. but after the final planning approval. because we as the citizens around these trees would like them there as long as possible. it s not clear dha this project will actually get through. so how do we know this? we would like these trees to stay as long as possible within our community. most of the people in fact all the people who live around there work and can t come for various reasons. all of them are passionate, you have received letters. i would like to give you a little bit of education and this
your problem? that is correct. all right. so just private contracts separated out so that it would then not have to involve the city in this type of dispute. is that right. in terms of figuring out where the most appropriate placement would be for this type of smf. they most likely need a building permit for the connections and such. they might have to go through planning and building in this case. okay. that s helpful. thanks. thank you. mr. quan, on that question, i thought they needed this box in proximity to another box and they are connecting to it. wouldn t that still be under your jurisdiction? the statement from at&t is this secondary box needs to be within 300 feet of their primary box. so ultimately at&t would have to apply for an excavation permit to trench the conduit to context the 2 boxes. that would be a normal excavation permit which will issue which still maybe appealable to this appellate body. that s something different in this case. the iss
that s where the challenge is where the department faces and we recognize that. mr. quan, based upon are you finished? yes. based upon the map that you showed us, if it was midpoint of that block, it wouldn t have reached there s a fundamental difference again, i want to try to clarify, for food trucks, they use the location, what they propose and use the property corners and go for 300 feet for carts, that s notification requirement, this is from 2nd to first street, using the midpoint there, 300 or if that block length is more than 300 feet, all the property owners along that corridor is notified in addition. that s not really that pertinent to my decision-making, but i d like to go back and because you brought up a number of cases where you thought that the input of the appeals influenced the criteria a little bit. i d like to go back to one on bao el street that the department looked at the 300 foot and used it as a fixed criteria. this is the one where th
that s where the challenge is where the department faces and we recognize that. mr. quan, based upon are you finished? yes. based upon the map that you showed us, if it was midpoint of that block, it wouldn t have reached there s a fundamental difference again, i want to try to clarify, for food trucks, they use the location, what they propose and use the property corners and go for 300 feet for carts, that s notification requirement, this is from 2nd to first street, using the midpoint there, 300 or if that block length is more than 300 feet, all the property owners along that corridor is notified in addition. that s not really that pertinent to my decision-making, but i d like to go back and because you brought up a number of cases where you thought that the input of the appeals influenced the criteria a little bit. i d like to go back to one on bao el street that the department looked at the 300 foot and used it as a fixed criteria. this is the one where th
for me. that s where the challenge is where the department faces and we recognize that. mr. quan, based upon are you finished? yes. based upon the map that you showed us, if it was midpoint of that block, it wouldn t have reached there s a fundamental difference again, i want to try to clarify, for food trucks, they use the location, what they propose and use the property corners and go for 300 feet for carts, that s notification requirement, this is from 2nd to first street, using the midpoint there, 300 or if that block length is more than 300 feet, all the property owners along that corridor is notified in addition. that s not really that pertinent to my decision-making, but i d like to go back and because you brought up a number of cases where you thought that the input of the appeals influenced the criteria a little bit. i d like to go back to one on bao el street that the department looked at the 300 foot and used it as a fixed criteria. this is the one