about the language in the text. it does not mention phase out. it does not talk about this critical decade. there s no finance on the table for low and middle income countries to make this clean energy transition. so it s just a complete disaster of a text, and there are still a few hours left. we can definitely turn this around, but there has to be the political will and the presidency has to ensure that we get the outcome that we came here to secure. we will get the views of our panel over the next hour. joining me is our panel, amanda renteria, who was the national political director for hillary clinton s 2016 presidential campaign willjoin us in a moment. now, peterwalker, deputy political editor at the guardian. c0 p28, cop28, so much talk about phasing out fossil fuels we get the text a couple of hours ago and it s not in there. do you make of it? fitter couple of hours ago and it s not in there. do you make of it? after were ve , ve there. do you make of it? after wer
and barbenheimmer is back barbie and oppenheimmer lead the nominations at the global globe awards. we re going to start with the cop28 climate summit in dubai. we are getting to the crucial part. the un climate body has published the latest draught of a deal it hopes to pass. what s not in it has caused anger. no commitment to phasing out fossilfuels. so let s take a look. the text includes a range of actions that could be taken by countries to reduce emissions. the word could not should. we will come back to that. this includes a promise to treble renewable energy capacity by 2030. however, it makes no direct reference to phasing out fossil fuel. that was something demanded by the un secretary general, antonio guterres, earlier on monday. take a listen. a central aspect, in my opinion, of the success of the cop will be for the cop to reach a consensus on the need to phase out fossil fuels in line with the tight framework that is in line with 1.5 degrees limit. that doesn t
This is the Main Assembly line. Reporter Arnold Kamler is the ceo of bca, the Bicycle Corporation of america, his familys business since 1905. The company has a factory in china, but kamler recently moved 10 of bcas business back to the u. S. Why . Wages for Chinese Workers have soared out of sight. Kamler bought this abandoned factory and created 140 jobs, a lifeline in this distressed industrial town. But the only way to make it work was investing in robotics. Were creating jobs with the automation and being able to be price competitive with china now, and it will get even better in the future. Reporter 6 million of automation does the work of more than 100 workers. I dont think a lot of people would look at that as a potential threat. That robot over there will be over here one day. Were not replacing other jobs with these robots. What were doing is were adding equipment that makes us more efficient. Reporter production manager Albertus Jones sees these machines as coworkers. A lot
Not that easy but sees the move as cementing israels long standing claim on jerusalem. But the palestinians also claim the city as their capital and fear the move would spark violence. This is an earthquake. This is not just moving an embassy, its an earthquake. Reporter Senior Palestinian adviser husam zomlot said moving the u. S. Embassy would greatly reduce the chances for peace. Moving the embassy to jerusalem is taking away a great deal of hope toward the future. Moving the embassy, the u. S. Embassy, dismantling the foundation of the Peace Process will definitely open the gates for those who want to see violence. Reporter jerusalem touches a nerve, its home to religious sites claimed by muslims, jews and christians. Arent you concerned this could hurt the Peace Process, could spark violence . We would not have a state if we were deterred and concerned about the threats we receive every once in a while. Reporter since President Trump was sworn in, more than 3,000 new homes for Isr