Page 23 - Quos News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Quos. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Quos Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Non-whistleblower hearsay whistleblower said quid pro quos took place. the transcript revealed these claims were false by the corrupt, congenital liar. we need to know if this person had a political agenda, whether there was collusion with schiff s office, whether there was collusion with the democratic candidate they supported, we need to know who that person was friends with, we need to know what contact he had with john brennan. in other words, we know brennan, he hates donald trump and he s a former c.i.a. director. has a lot of power and a lot of deep-state friends still working there. susan rice s name is mentioned in sperry s article. what about a relationship with adam schiff? where and when did he meet with people in schiff s office? did schiff s office recommend hiring a lawyer? was it a specific lawyer? did they recommend going to the ....
How do you defend the fact that gordon sondland, the point man on ukraine, the shadow ukraine policy is stating according to vindman, there needs to me a quid pro quo. whenever faced with that question or asked, look, there is evidence piling up that is showing there were quid pro quos, multiple ones, that is what taylor testified to and then republicans say that is not a quid pro quo. i don t see a quid pro quo in that. or they just continue to attack the democratic process, the process that democrats are using. they don t really dive into the substance and they say that they believe that the president has hasn t done anything wrong and they deflect consistently. or they say that democrats need to bring this out into the public. and we ll see whether or not their arguments hold once this moves into the the process argument becomes moot. it is an easier argument to make for a while and it was sort of a place-holder so you don t deal with the substance as much. ....
Witch hunt, we have the corrupt, compromise, coward, and congenital liar adam schiff. he wants you to believe something much different. schiff, who won t come on this show to defend himself. he has zero fidelity to truth. he is a pathetic liar. and for three years, he has worshiped at the altar of his impeachment lies. his constant lies. he s got all the evidence we would ever need about russia russia russia collusion. it was a hoax and conspiracy, lies, didn t work out. now let s try ukraine. its evolving narrative, what they are now calling it. in other words, you have the cowardly schiff trying really hard to get his lies straight. remember, first according to schiff, there were multiple direct quid pro quos from the president s call with your ....
Testimony at this point in time. we don t have a lot of documents, i assume they re trying to get that. there will be fights over that. maybe the state department as opposed to the white house, they can prize personal records. but the evidence is pretty overwhelming. there was not just one quid pro quo, there were three quid pro quos, the white house meeting, the $400 million in military assistance and the javelin missiles trump will talk about, if you will do me a favor, though, so you know trump keeps talking about substance and the republicans keep saying there is nothing there. the fallback position is, it is going to eeventually be yeah, well, maybe this wasn t so great. it s not impeachable. that s eventually where they will land, the republicans. so if that s where they are, the democrats will certainly go ahead and impeach. the real question is the timing. how long is it going to take to have public hearings. some of this stuff is getting bogged down in court decision. bolton h ....
Give us your take at this point, officials engaging in quid pro quos all of the time, but they are to serve the u.s. people, u.s. interests. given what we just learn what d is your take? first, i know the colonel. he was military there, a first rate officer, and she is first class. and it really angering me. it is outrageous and it names to stop in is someone that served on the battle feemd and off. you can disagree with him, but ....