Protection from the law. A good country, right . We will be watching him monday. Have a good weekend, everybody. Bill oreilly of next life. See you monday bill oreilly up next life. See you monday. Bill the Oreilly Factor is on tonight. We can confirm now that the u. S. Has lost tomahawk missiles at syria. The action by President Trump has caused worldwide reaction. Did the usa did the right thing by attacking the brutal dictator assad . We will have multiple tonight. It doesnt make sense for assad to make these decisions. Bill there is some on the friends you will not support American Military action the matter what. We will take a look at that situation. The nomination of neil m. Neil m. Gorsuch to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States is confirmed. Also ahead, the usa has a brandnew Supreme Court justice. Is that a good thing for you . Caution. You are about to enter into the no spin zone. That the factor begins now. Hi max, im bill oreilly. Thank you for
Tamara keith, White House Correspondent for npr. And ken vogel political reporter for the New York Times. Thank you all for being with us especially as part of our Leadoff Panel tonight. Ken, ill lead off with you. What do you make of this bank subpoena, if true, is it a big deal . What else does it speak of . Absolutely. We always kind of knew that this was a possibility that mueller would start looking into Donald Trumps finances and this subpoena, again, if it is accurate that Deutsche Bank has been subpoenaed, would indicate that he is fully going down that route. Deutsche bank is significant because donald trump it has at least 130 million worth of Donald Trumps debt and it sold some of that debt or could have sold some of that debt to russian banks. That could potentially give these russian banks some leverage over donald trump. And so you have the combination here potentially of Donald Trumps finances as well as his
dealings with russia and how those two things intertwine. So ev
know, anything, the press corps or us that the vice president is even a question here? i mean, it s b.s. howard: i m going to give you each 20 seconds. many mollie, she wouldn t even be able to vote to confirm herself. right. i think this is really a function of people understanding that cam rah a harris is a bit of a political liability. she is not considered someone who club will succeed who will succeed president biden just because of her weaknesses, but it s not going to happen because she couldn t vote to confirm herself. i think that s debatable, but she probably couldn t, and that would lose the tie in the senate. the democrats lose as the tie breaker. howard: leslie, and then the country would spent two months debating and congress would have to approve the new vice president. quick thoughts. it s not going to happen. the president has said kamala harris will be on the ticket in 2024, and she will. she is the vice president. i think it speaks to the shallowness of some
allowed to vote again in that state, but she says that nobody ever told her that that particular conviction meant that she couldn t vote. and her county elections board admits in writing that despite her conviction, they never actually took her off the voting rolls, a probation officer with the tennessee department of corrections, even wrote her a note filled out an official certificate saying that ms. moses was eligible to vote. ms. moses turned in that certificate from the probation officer, along with her voter registration application, and for that grave crime, she was just sentenced in tennessee. what was her sentence? she got six years in prison. that has just happened this week in tennessee. what s the big difference between pam moses in tennessee and all of those other guys, who actually cast illegalballs in illegal ballots in the names of relatives they knew were dead, all those were probation
speaks soberly and the exact qualifications democrats hate and a mayor. michelle goldberg who on hearin gang wrote this, every other candidate spoke of homelessness as a disaster for the homeless, yang discussed it as a quality-of-life problem for everyone else. because of that, she couldn t vote for it yang who. so she stupid or just liberally misleading. she got a track record for both. but her assumption is if you express concern about the legitimate safety concerns of the city you live in, you lack compassion for the homeless. it s as if normal folks can t hold two ideas in their heads, that we can t aid the homeless and the citizens who deal with them on the streets. maybe it s just the writer they can t hold two ideas in their head and the stupidity prevents others from speaking out knowin she will label them fascist for wanting to protect their loved ones. i didn t think weapon icing compassion was possible, but that s how michael bolton got m