Office that because the culture of the post office was that because the culture of the post office was all about the post office brand office was all about the post office brand and office was all about the post office brand and damn the Sub Postmasters . No. Brand and damn the Sub Postmasters . No what brand and damn the Sub Postmasters . No. What other explanation is that when no. What other explanation is that when we no. What other explanation is that when we see a total absence of care about when we see a total absence of care about people with families you should about people with families you should be trying to protect, not prosecute . Should be trying to protect, not rosecute . , , ,. , prosecute . Thats why we brought in second side prosecute . Thats why we brought in second side and prosecute . Thats why we brought in second side and wanted prosecute . Thats why we brought in second side and wanted to second side and wanted to investigate the cases, because at that point it
Statement in which she said she only became formally aware of the bugs and effects within the Horizon System in 2013, and prior to that she said she was aware of what she called rumblings about the system. She was pressed over when she learned of the horizon a bug. Jason beer asked her if she was aware that fujitsu had for me notified the post office of the receipts of Payments Mismatches on october 2020, she replied, she was not aware of that, she added she was not aware of a meeting between fujitsu and the post office in october 2010 to discuss the bug and she said she dont have that in 2013 and she was also asked towards the end of the session why the onus was on postmasters to prove their innocence rather than the post office to prove their guilt, she replied, i think back then the assumption was that if there was a loss in the branch, that it was the responsibility of the postmaster. Mr beer noted that there was a lot of assuming going on and she agreed. The inquiry is now taking