Statement in which she said she only became formally aware of the bugs and effects within the Horizon System in 2013, and prior to that she said she was aware of what she called rumblings about the system. She was pressed over when she learned of the horizon a bug. Jason beer asked her if she was aware that fujitsu had for me notified the post office of the receipts of Payments Mismatches on october 2020, she replied, she was not aware of that, she added she was not aware of a meeting between fujitsu and the post office in october 2010 to discuss the bug and she said she dont have that in 2013 and she was also asked towards the end of the session why the onus was on postmasters to prove their innocence rather than the post office to prove their guilt, she replied, i think back then the assumption was that if there was a loss in the branch, that it was the responsibility of the postmaster. Mr beer noted that there was a lot of assuming going on and she agreed. The inquiry is now taking
Me, £31,000, was in fact caused by the horizon me, £31,000, was in fact caused by the Horizon System, this was as early the Horizon System, this was as early as the Horizon System, this was as early as 2004 yes, that should have been early as 2004 yes, that should have been done early as 2004 yes, that should have been done. Do think it should have been been done. Do think it should have been an been done. Do think it should have been an independent investigation, ie independent of The Post Office . | ie independent of The Post Office . I dont ie independent of The Post Office . Dont know ie independent of The Post Office . I dont know about that, it should have been an investigation within The Post Office but from my Working Knowledge and my memory, there certainly wasnt a function that did that back then. It was only when we started working on the second site and i started bringing that a Team Together that we pulled together, from my perspective, knowledge and they know how to put
in this one. john: it s a lion s roar. noah: i mean, that is ridiculous. mary: yeah. i have to applaud. he gave him the angle and zverev found the reply. noah: missed that one. noah: right back to his bread and butter, zverev gets the insurance rate, and he ll serve for a spot in the finals when we come back. welcome to roland-garros. ( ) ( ) (luke) this will be a gold mine of local intel. (marci) so, tell us about this corn festival. ( ) (stylist) oooh you got your corn pudding. (marci) so.is it safe around here? (stylist) sometimes. [luke gasping] (marci) no eyebrows? (luke) think of how light it ll feel in the summer. we gotta run. eleven thousand more neighborhoods to go! (vo) ding dong! homes-dot-com. noah: sascha zverev trying to reach second grand slam final, lost in 2020 at the u.s. open. he is one game away, has been serving almost like a cyborg from his second set on. john: what a bummer for casper ruud, though. trying to make the breakthrough,
nbc bay area s investigative unit reviewed records for rape and sexual battery cases from the san mateo sheriff s office dating back to 2018. through public records request, we obtained information on 60 cases and cross referenced their original charges with the final outcome. we found 32% of the cases were either rejected by the da s office or later dismissed; 11% are ongoing; and about half, only 57%, were resolved. of the 31 cases where the da charged the defendant with a sex crime, 19 resulted in a sex crime conviction; four were convicted of a sex crime by jury; but in eight cases, 26% of the time, the defendant negotiated a non-sex related plea deal. shin-mee: sometimes the facts or the witness statements change after we file the case, and if our case is weaker than we originally assessed it to be, then we are going to enter into negotiations with defense. hilda: but a law enforcement source with direct knowledge of