these are all organizations opposed to the death penalty. but what this case different from others in the past as we approach the 11th hour there are hundreds of thousands of people. you saw their signatures on those petitions that were delivered. these are people, a lot of these people may not typically be against the death penalty. these are people who are looking at the case thinking that there are doubts here and that an execution needs to be stopped. there s a lot of people pushing to have his sentence commuted and not have him set free. you don t see a lot of people coming right out and saying this man is innocent. speaking of those who do think he should be set free or at least the case looked at, some names might surprise you. the former fbi director william sessions who wrote an op-ed in the newspaper in atlanta yesterday saying, the evidence in this case consisting almost entirely of conflicting stories, testimonies an statements is inadequate to the task of co
cervical cancer is a horrible way to die. i just wanted to add, we cannot forget that in the midst of this executive order, there is a big drug company that made millions of dollars because of this mandate. we can t deny that. what are you suggest something. what i m saying is that it s wrong for a drug company, because the governor s former chief of staff was the chief lobbyist for this drug company. the drug company gave thousands of dollars in political donations to the governor. and this is just flat-out wrong. the question is sit about life or was it about millions of dollars and month tpotentially, billions for a drug company. you need to respond? yes, sir. the company was merck. and it was a $5,000 contribution that i had received from them. i raise about $30 million. if you re saying that i can be bought for $5,000 i m offended. he cannot be bought but keeping them honest he doesn t answer whether he can be influenced by this man. he served as perr
scientists come forward to challenge her claims about the controversial hpv vaccine. jim acosta is covering the race to unseat perry. shall we say it is a race indeed. it absolutely is, wolf, and the only thing missing from the campaign trail this week, michael buffer. the professional wrestler master of ceremonies, who s known for his battle cry, let s get ready to rumble. it s the main event for the gop comes down to rick perry versus mitt romney, stand back. just yesterday, that jobs legacy in massachusetts got even worse. in iowa, perry is laying into romney s health care plan, pointing to this study from a conservative think tank that concluded the program has cost the state 18,000 jobs. a finding romney aides call deeply flawed. it kills toos many jobs and gets between you and your doctor. doesn t make any difference whether it s passed in massachusetts or washington, d.c. it is bad medicine and needs to be stopped. his campaign is holding up this gallup poll.
i just wanted to add that we cannot forget that in the midst of this executive order, there was a big drug company that made millions of dollars because of this mandate. we can t deny that. what are you suggesting? what i m saying is that it s wrong for a drug company, because the governor s former chief of staff was the chief lobbyist for this drug company. the drug company gave thousands of dollars in political donations to the governor. and this is just flat-out wrong. the question is is it about life or was it about millions of dollars and potentially, billions for a drug company? i will let senator santorum respond to th hold off on that for a moment. you have got to respond to that yes, sir. the company was merck. and it was a $5,000 contribution that i had received from them. i raise about $30 million. if you re saying that i can be bought for $5,000, i m offended. mr. perry says he cannot be bought but keeping them honest, he doesn t answer whether he ca
i just wanted to add that we cannot forget that in the midst of this executive order, there was a big drug company that made millions of dollars because of this mandate. we can t deny that. what are you suggesting? what i m saying is that it s wrong for a drug company, because the governor s former chief of staff was the chief lobbyist for this drug company. the drug company gave thousands of dollars in political donations to the governor. and this is just flat-out wrong. the question is is it about life or was it about millions of dollars and potentially, billions for a drug company? i will let senator santorum hold off on that for a moment. you have got to respond to that yes, sir. the company was merck. and it was a $5,000 contribution that i had received from them. i raise about $30 million. if you re saying that i can be bought for $5,000, i m offended. mr. perry says he cannot be bought but keeping them honest, he doesn t answer whether he can be influence