three sets of secret documents and three sets of confidential documents. a total of 11 sets of classified records. three laws are also listed as a legal basis for the warrant. one is part of the espionage act. and while that has a lot of people jumping to conclusions and conjuring up visions of spies, it is important to note the espionage act encompasses a lot more than just that. it makes it a crime to remove or misuse information related to national defence. also listed, a law forbidding hiding or destroying classified material, and another makes it illegal to destroy or falsify evidence in an investigation. former solicitor general neal katyal explained why that last one is very significant. that is the one that probably does require an inside source, a mole or something like that, working with the fbi. otherwise, it s hard for me to understand how the fbi would have thought that that would have been a potential crime. the fbi also found information about trump advisor r
states where abortion is not legal because of the overturning of roe v. wade, and to see if they can travel to states where those services are legal, and to have an ability to transfer the kinds of benefits that include transportation in certain circumstances, and the medical care to allow those women to have access to abortion. to look at how could that be done under the law. so this is really the president signing an order that directs hhs to set up a program to do that. so with the stroke of the pen that the president did in just the last half-hour or so, there isn t a new power that is immediately granted. but it sets in motion. also, tells of medical provider to be reminded that they are bound by federal law in certain cases, not state law, when there are instances to make certain there s no discrimination against patients. so it could be life of the mother in certain instances, ways that they can set up rules where even in a dire case, they actually would convene provid
all right. let s bring in karl rove, a fox news contributor. lots to go over, karl. where to start? i guess with the appointment of special counsel, jack smith, intending to investigate prognosis that may result independently, in the best traditions of the d. justice, the pace of the investigations will not pause or flag. under my watch, i will exercise independent judgment and moving the investigations expeditiously and thoroughly to whatever facts the law dictate. what political implications do you see here? an extraordinary moment we re talking about an investigation of a former president of the united states. the country would be best served if everyone let this process go forward and let the prosecutor do his work, special prosecutor do his work, outside of, you know, sort of screaming headlines. i doubt that s what s going to happen. president trump sort of laid the predicate for his response to