Police to gather things like location, information or serial numbers of not just a specific targets phone all target phones, but all those in the area. I can think of one particularly gruesome homicide we had a couple of years ago where while the case was resolved by itself our information, that was basically broke the case. We would have never found the suspect but for the historic selfdoubt information. Watch tonight at eight eastern on cspan2. Booktv is live beginning at 7 p. M. Eastern at politics prose bookstore in washington for race in america, a Panel Discussion with authors and educators about Race Relations examining the relationship between police and the africanamerican community. For campaign 2016 cspan continues on the road to the white house. We need serious leadership. This is not a reality tv show. Its as real as it gets. We will make America Great again. Ahead, live coverage of the debates on cspan, cspan radio app, cspan. Org. Monday september 26 is the first preside
Public policy experts are gathering this afternoon to discuss welfare policy. This event hosted by the Cato Institute in washington dc. They are expected to talk about ways to replace the current welfare system with the universal basic income rate and whether that would work. This is live coverage on cspan2. [inaudible conversation] [inaudible conversation]. [inaudible conversation] [inaudible conversation] all right, i want to take an opportunity to welcome you all to the Cato Institutes fai auditorium, my name is Michael Tanner, a senior fellow here at cato and i generally work on issues that have to do with poverty and inequality and other areas of economic policy. Today we are, we got a rare instance here at cato, a double performance if you will. We do a lot of book forums but we have to stick assistant distinguished authors dealing with books both released on the same topic at roughly the same time so its serendipity that we get you both here today. Were talking about the univers
Conditioned on various things in state cooperation in state enactment and regulations on federal requirements. In the finance committee, the origin of the aca 2002 with the tax credit offered and put in place in that year. The statutory provisions identified in the chairmans mark of the aca as the statutory precursor language that would be modified and build upon in enacting the statute. In fact, the structure of using coverage month as a basis for the part of how you define eligibility wasnt not found in a prior statutory language, a contracted the same committee. Experts propose doing it here. People that know a lot about health care. One example, professor tim jones, one of the most Prominent Health care professors in the country, significant enough to be invited to the white house when the statue was signed off authored a paper saying if were going to do a Seed Exchange model, we can come up with various ways of encouraging states to cooperate. One of the things we can do is we can
Proffered interpretation to see if those substantive effects are compatible with the statute as a whole and to see which interpretation is more consistent with the design and object of the statutory structure. As i said, that was a Supreme Court case. Those of you listening in the audience who are not familiar with recent Supreme Court cases might want to reject that reasoning as being maybe one of the liberal justices. It might have been our friend Justice Briar for a 54 majority with some purposebased argument. But no, that was Justice Scalia talking about his version of strict text chul interpretation. That should not be surprising. Its not the sort of psycho analysis or sort of general appeal to purpose that youve heard some liberals make and some advocates for the government, certainly not the liberal argument that was set forward as sort of a foil by my colleagues on the right, rather when Justice Scalia talks about intent, purpose, object, design, he is not talking about what he
Establish by the state is not used anywhere else in the statute except in provisions that are serving that purpose. Now, in terms of why would congress do this because this is the question. Why would congress think to do Something Like this . The condition achievement of goals on state cooperation. They did that on medicaid. They offered a lot of inducement on medicaid. Because congress cant come comen dear, everyone knew that congress could make states a really good offer but it had to be an offer. The state that refused to accept the Medicaid Expansion as the statute was written would leave the poorest and most Vulnerable People in that state without any help under the medicaid program. Thats the way the statute was written. Conditioning a whole lot of the statutes goals on states willingness to go along. They would do that with medicaid where a lot more is at stake. Why wouldnt they do it here . Congress has done this before. Congress has routinely said tax credits or other benefits