Signal is a one way signal. Source that everyone in the geographic area. Because it will be in the future internet interoperable if a talk to ats to broadcast signal, there will be morepportunity to have far engagement with your television broadcaster. In the political world, i wish existed when i was on the ballot. A will enable the ability of broadcaster to provide political advertising for members of Congress Just to the people in the districts they represent. Watch communicators kill 2. Tern on cspan next debate on merit of socialism. Versus from new york city this is an and 20 minutes. Applause thank you so much for coming out on a friday night. [applause] the reason that i was intrigued when bhaskar asked me wanted to do this, im sort issue. Uadable on this i came of age at a time when it alternatives to capitalism has been completely discredited. Remember or hard to hard to understand if you werent around then, how much it nom as if there was really alternative. It kind of didnt
The fight for cyber supremacy. Land day, no mans surviving america in the 21st century. Gatekeepers. E author series, all this week at 8 a. M. Eastern, on cspan, cspan. Org, and cspan radio. Recent debate on capitalism and socialism with editors and academics. Nick gillespie argued in favor of capitalism. A New York University professor argued in favor of socialism. Michelle goldberg, New York Times columnist, moderated the debate. This is one hour and 20 minutes. [applause] they can also much for coming out on a friday night. We are here to discuss that capitalism improves the standards of living and provides economic opportunity. The reason i was intrigued when someone asked me if i wanted to do this i came of age at a when it seems as if alternatives to capitalism had been completely discredited. Remember, how much you have seen if there was really no alternative. It doesnt matter what you think of human mortality, the m imaginefact of life, i that if you are coming of age now, it s
Professor argued in favor of socialism. This took place in new york city. [applause] thank you so much for coming out on a friday night. [applause] we are here to debate out on a friday night. The proposition that capitalism is the best way to improve standards of living, ensures liberal and economic freedoms and provides opportunity. The reason that i was intrigued when bhaskar asked me if i wanted to do this, im sort of persuadable on this issue. I came of age at a time when it seemed as if alternatives to capitalism has been completely discredited. I think its hard to remember or hard to understand if you werent around then, how much it seem as if there was really no alternative. It kind of didnt matter what you thought of capitalism just like it doesnt matter what you think of human mortality. It was inevitable fact of life after fall of communism. If you are coming of age now, it seems that just as communism had failed, capitalism has now failed. Were governed by this comic book o
So this is panel two. Thank you so much for coming. Take it away. Thank you ron and thanks to all of you for being here. My name is a. Im in policy studies at the American Enterprise institute. I work in tax policy labor markets. One of the areas ive recently been focusing on is paid family leave. As im listening to the conversation i think you know generally talking about paid leave and child care and how we reform the existing system in the u. S. Is very important to the conversation that we have here. Ive also written about the system of child care, the Child Tax Credit, the you know, the system of tax credits that we have and how much of it is queued toward people at the top. How people with the benefits doesnt go to the people with the lower income. This is part of a larger discussion how do we reform child care how to we make it more accessible to people at the bottom. The first panel was more about why we need these policies. Why are we even talking about universal child allowan
Programs available to children and their parents. Welcome to black irookings. Along with richard reeves, the gentleman to my right, and i codirect the center here called the center on children and families which were extremely pleased to do. And were pleased to be holding this event as well. About an old policy idea which is often called the childrens allowance. A species of guaranteed annual income. With some new twists. Why would be concerned about the childrens allowance, the idea of giving a guaranteed cash benefit to families. And i think there are a lot of reasons but i think two are predominant. One has always been a good reason to do it, and that is it costs a lot of money to raise a child, at least a quarter of a million dollars. The estimates vary greatly. But it is a lot of money to raise children. And theyre the ffew future. Without kids we wouldnt have a future. The second is an issue of debate. Maybe well have some today about that. And that is since welfare reform in 96