outnumbered, i m harris faulkner with my co-host emily compagno and kayleigh mcenany. joining us today host of kennedy saves the world podcast, kennedy herself. co-host of bottom line on fox business, sean duffy is here. let s get started. breaking news kevin mccarthies he will be leaving congress this year. this shocking announcement after his historic removal from the speakership in october and his departure is set to make republicans already slim majority tighter heading into 2024. the former speaker announced his decision in op ed titled, i m leaving the house, but not the fi fight. i have seen the goodness of the american people and they will uphold the enduring value of our great nation. we all have a role to play in that effort, i never could have imagined the journey when i threw my hat in the ring, i left it on the field and with a smile on my face. looking back, i wouldn t have had it any other way. only in america, he says. sean. sean: kevin mccarthy was a memb
are setting records every week, virtually. which, by the way, means companies coming in, and jobs, jobs, jobs. that s what it s about. but i was with the top guys, these are guys that do this for a living, and i said, can you go into china and pick up $1.5 billion in 10 minutes? they said impossible. i said, well, supposing you guys, could they do it? can t do it, can t do it. but a guy with no expanse can do it. and the fake news doesn t even want to write about it. but it will become a major campaign issue. it will become it will become a major campaign issue. americans deserve assuming he wins, which i hope he does. i mean, the only problem is, we will have the lowest ratings in the history of the base, because he is a very sleepy person. he s exhausted. joe is exhausted. tired.
things on, run to c cnn and msn. let them they move onto the next story line. tucker: any journalist who tells you you must trust i ve never trusted a politician in my life and i never will. why would i? someone like adam schiff. does anyone really believe he doesn t know the whistle-blower s identity, tucker? journalists are like, if he says that, he must not. it s absurd. tucker: the great buck sexton, good to see you. as impeachment continues shifting from a drama to a kind of soap opera, trump advisor kellyanne conway s marriage doesn t have anything to do with ukraine, but over on cnn, they decided it s fair game. a final question, a sensitive question. it s a political question. it s a substantive question. i don t want to talk about your marriage. i know there are issues there. your husband, george conway
dissents. five unelected rulers declaring they are the rulers of 320 million americans. i believe in democracy and the constitution. i think when the supreme court violates their oaths and undermines the constitution that is a great threat to our nation. let s go to the issue of marriage. the minute the federal government gives tax benefits based on marriage doesn t it make marriage suddenly a federal decision that the supreme court does have to make a decision about? of course it doesn t. from the beginning of our country literally from the first days of our country, marriage has always been a question for the states. you know, the question of gay plarnlg and the policy issue, reasonable minds can disagree. i am a strong supporter of traditional marriage, between one man and one woman. you and i may disagree on that but under the constitution there was a mechanism for us to resolve our disagreements. which is if you want to change the marriage laws of your states
undermines the constitution that is a great threat to our nation. let s go to the issue of marriage. the minute the federal government gives tax benefits based on marriage doesn t it make marriage suddenly a federal decision that the supreme court does have to make a decision about? of course it doesn t. from the beginning of our country literally from the first days of our country, marriage has always been a question for the states. you know, the question of gay plarnlg and the policy issue, reasonable minds can disagree. i am a strong supporter of traditional marriage, between one man and one woman. you and i may disagree on that but under the constitution there was a mechanism for us to resolve our disagreements. which is if you want to change the marriage laws of your states the constitutional mechanism is to convince your fellow citizens to change the marriage laws. what that might mean is some states, california, new york, maybe they d go one way, and other states like texas