Stay updated with breaking news from Magic telescope. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Ingram Planetarium hosting limited time Christmas shows wwaytv3.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from wwaytv3.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Compelling argument. in a fraud case, or an obstruction case it all turns on the defendants state of mind. did the defendant have the intent to commit fraud? can you pierces mind to know what his attempt was? we all know trump fired mother or but did he do it for a corpus or not? there have been a lot of debates on this program and elsewhere trying to figure out proof of trump s state of mind and in for, but we don t have a magic telescope. drug case is very simple, if you have an ounce of heroin in your basement, you are guilty? it s very simple. maybe you can argue it s powdered sugar maybe your wife put it in there, you had no idea. but it s pretty tough. this is more like that kind of case. there are some differences to be sure. but particularly given the run up here where there is a grand jury subpoena, he was notified many times that the governor wanted this stuff back, and was ....
El Ayuntamiento de Santa Cruz de La Palma busca fórmulas para potenciar el turismo de congresos y convenciones – canariasactual.com canariasactual.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from canariasactual.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
General for basically doing what he had to do. he was required to do under the rules of the justice department. renado i have to ask you, when you re dealing with obstruction, i m not an attorney but that s what i hear from the attorneys and legal folks here, you have to establish intent correct? what is the intent? and i m wondering if the president s tweets, what he said is that going to come into play when they re trying to figure out what his intent was behindfully of these meetings and questions or his actions? no question. so what mueller has to prove is that president had corrupt intent, in other words the intent to unlawfully interfere with or impede the investigation. the way you prove as a prosecutor, somebody s intent, you don t have a magic telescope that sees inside their brain. you look at their words and actions over a long period of time and you ask a jury to form conclusions about the person s intent from those words and actions. so, for example, why was the presid ....
Investigation. the way you prove as a from t prosecutor, somebody s intent, you don t have a magic telescope that sees inside their brain. you look at their words and actions over a long period of time and you ask a jury to form conclusions about the person s intent from those words and actions. so, for example, why was the president so angry at jeff sessions for doing what he was legally required to do by recusing himself? why did he talk about the attorney general protecting him? why did he fire james comey? why did he tweet about there being tapes during the conversations? all these specific questions that you are reading, don, relate to actions that could be used by a prosecutor to infer that the president was trying to act with the intent to impede the investigation. okay, michael, lot of questions related to the campaign s accord nation with russia. questions like there one, when did you become aware of trump ....