general for basically doing what he had to do. he was required to do under the rules of the justice department. >> renado i have to ask you, when you're dealing with obstruction, i'm not an attorney but that's what i hear from the attorneys and legal folks here, you have to establish intent correct? what is the intent? and i'm wondering if the president's tweets, what he said is that going to come into play when they're trying to figure out what his intent was behindfully of these meetings and questions or his actions? >> no question. so what mueller has to prove is that president had corrupt intent, in other words the intent to unlawfully interfere with or impede the investigation. the way you prove as a prosecutor, somebody's intent, you don't have a magic telescope that sees inside their brain. you look at their words and actions over a long period of time and you ask a jury to form conclusions about the person's intent from those words and actions. so, for example, why was the president so angry at jeff
Related Keywords
Frenado , Rules , Justice Department , Obstruction , Intent , Attorney , Attorneys , Folks , Questions , President , Question , Investigation , Way , Tweets , Actions , Words , Meetings , Prosecutor , Magic Telescope , Somebody , Behindfully , Play , Person , Example , Jeff Sessions , Conclusions , Brain , Jury ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.