Stay updated with breaking news from Linda tucker. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
And Jennifer Gray is here. And also the rock star millionaire listings josh aln h t pe inside of some fabulous homes. Lookie lou. And amanda frytag is here with some lusty chicken. And we have Lou Manfredini and everyday is a funday, and so today is National Coffee day and that means that lots off places are giving away coffee for free. Peohr coffee. Dunkin donuts. And wawa. I never heard of them. And krispy kreme. And for the complss gh. Nue s michael breach who has made us a beautiful coffee today and why would we ruin the art . Lets not slurp these things. He has done a dinosaur from jurassic park. A cat and dog. Oh, my gosh. Look at that. The sidney opera house. Who does that michael. Michael. Yeah, right here. Yes. Sanoh yd e e t itmnnd things like that, and just, you know, doing stuff that is out of the ordinary wi ....
Are you serious . Wills. Ou marry me . They are going to be makkng some beautiful music together. God bless them. That is nice. My favorite rereactions of all and even more than the bride is the entire famynh ta p. That is the genius of the whole show. And that is talented to the go from the lower register up there is so beautiful. They both ended up on team pharrell. And Tyler Dickerson made a big h impression, too. Baby here i am im a man all of the same and bayh, you have to come home with me well, i some good old loving and when i get around you you come running back for more i know you. What is your name . Tyler dickerson. Did you have a deal in nashville . Yes. What is your store y. I got signed at 15, and john rich was my manager and so when i was on tour i got a call from the president of the the label that they canceled the label and so then i got into a car accident and flipped my car five times, and had it all and it w ....
Continuances was the straw hat to redesign the facility so we worked and came up with a dive design and the facade was determined by the staff not to be suitable either. One part of the problem in the process we gave a different direction the first time and we made it on the first pass we motivate sound like there was a solution and there wasnt. We had an indefinite continuance but if it comes back that way its clear commissioners, if i may clarify something because it seems like we are going to be missing on some of the votes for clarity. A motion to continue is a procedural matter only thomas a. Swifts electric rifle take a minority for 3 votes to continue the matter. To approve e. R. Disapprove the to adapt it to approve or disapprove will take 4 vote if neither of those happen the project is disapproved because the application before you fails. And it just gets disapproved without daumentd a formal motion it just fails you thank you commissioner moore. I think the original continua ....
Planning code section 305. Specifically, there is no hardship or practical difficulty that justifies essentially 100 percent lot coverage or even if you consider the ally the unbuildable portion. Lot, thats 84 percent coverage. No other home in this neighborhood has or has ever proposed the mass and scale of this project such that finding no. 3 could not be met and last we believe the variance should not be approved unless there is a reduction in the main area to accommodate sufficient rear yard Building Space so we do not create a detrimental precedent for the neighborhood. Thank you for your time. Hello, good afternoon, commissioners, thank you for this opportunity. My name is james clamerty, i live at 45 219th street. I am one of 7dr filers who believe the sign of this design is just too large for this location. I will show how the design will be out of scale for the lot, it will cause a walling in effect of lampson lane and it ....
It should also be mentioned this is not the first time the architect has provided us with faulty renderings. The first time was with the 311 renderings. It turns out we are not the opblg ones with concerns about this project. It has undergone 4 Residential Design Team reviews which have expressed concerns about the mass and scale of the project and made numerous requests for changes. However it appears every time the Planning Department requests a change, say x, the sponsoring team only gives them part of x rdt asks for an 11foot reduction yet what went out was only a 4 foot reduction and even now only the top floor has an 11 foot reduction. They were askd for a 5 foot yet only gave 3 feet. They only gave 13 feet to the opaque outier shell. The Design Review asks for a front set back which was partially gran ....