Thin as relatives wait for hours on end as their loved ones are detained by the travel ban at sfo. His family brought lawyers. We have a relative who is coming from dubai and they gave them a hell of a time. Im waiting for my mother. She is on this flight right now. She is coming from iraq. She has a green card. Shes been in the United States over three years now. Reporter authorities waiting for a different detainee. I asked her who is in the room with you . She said the numbers are about 25 or so. I asked who are those individuals . She said theyre middle easterns and mexicans and some indians. Reporter after four hours of questioning, this woman and her family were reunited with hugs and tears around 4 00 this afternoon. Thank you. Everything. Reporter obviously, a very happy reunion there. There were representatives here from senator Kamala Harris office. They say theyre their facilitate and help families who have been detained. They say yesterday all the detainees were released. T
Planning code section 305. Specifically, there is no hardship or practical difficulty that justifies essentially 100 percent lot coverage or even if you consider the ally the unbuildable portion. Lot, thats 84 percent coverage. No other home in this neighborhood has or has ever proposed the mass and scale of this project such that finding no. 3 could not be met and last we believe the variance should not be approved unless there is a reduction in the main area to accommodate sufficient rear yard Building Space so we do not create a detrimental precedent for the neighborhood. Thank you for your time. Hello, good afternoon, commissioners, thank you for this opportunity. My name is james clamerty, i live at 45 219th street. I am one of 7dr filers who believe the sign of this design is just too large for this location. I will show how the design will be out of scale for the lot, it will cause a walling in effect of lampson lane and it will forever block one of the nicest public views along
Was going to replace what is currently there, it was just unimaginable to me. Im not objecting to the addition of a second unit, i think im all for im not antigrowth, i think development there is reasonable, but the current scope and size of this thing and the footprint is just beyond my imagination and i respectfully request that as proposed this be denied. Thank you. Thank you. Any further speakers . Good evening, commissioners, my name is jued igt lamb, i am speaking for the Eureka Valley Association Planning and land use committee. We have an interest in this project, we are quite concerned about preserving the small scale family nature of the Eureka Valley hill side and this is an example of what is happening kind of piecemeal in Eureka Valley where projects that are out of scale with the neighborhood, with the context, are proposed. And we have managed to get some scale back and we certainly hope you are going to scale this one back as well. I notice this is put before you as an
Catherine lets go back to the News Conference they are starting. Reporter this is my third and will be my last press release while on scene. Ntsb express our sincere condolences to good friends, family, and coworkers of the deceased. Finding the activity and after yesterdays phase is just a fact gathering phase until we continue to gather evidence that will assist in this investigation. Now an update to include what we did today. On seeing preliminary calculations based on land of track segment was accomplished. This equipment does not have the type of reporters to capture trains speed we would need to use other devices to obtain training speak. Speed. The damage to the equipment has been documented. During this inspection. An examination on some of the rear car wheels were noted such a flat spot may be the result of application on the train prior to striking the two persons on the track. We have also requested 30 days of maintenance on these railcars. We continue to achieve at your do
It should also be mentioned this is not the first time the architect has provided us with faulty renderings. The first time was with the 311 renderings. It turns out we are not the opblg ones with concerns about this project. It has undergone 4 Residential Design Team reviews which have expressed concerns about the mass and scale of the project and made numerous requests for changes. However it appears every time the Planning Department requests a change, say x, the sponsoring team only gives them part of x rdt asks for an 11foot reduction yet what went out was only a 4 foot reduction and even now only the top floor has an 11 foot reduction. They were askd for a 5 foot yet only gave 3 feet. They only gave 13 feet to the opaque outier shell. The Design Review asks for a front set back which was partially granted and although the rdt agreed to this it demonstrates an on h f going pattern of the sponsor not complying with the recommendations. We are not trying to stop this project rxz we