apply to the president because there s no evidence but if you apply it to loretta lynch, there s a good case that she not only engaged in obstruction of justice because there was a lie attached to what she was insisting comey say publicly but there s also misconduct of office. using federal agency for political purpose. that should be investigated. sean: let me go to jay. she bleached it. she destroyed she signed off on 20% of uranium going to putin. and the fbi didn t do anything about it.o they cleared her. sean: statue of limitations, my friend. james comey became judge and jury in that case.li he thought the attorney general is not capable.
obstruction of justice doesn t apply to the president because there s no evidence but if you apply it to loretta lynch, there s a good case that she not only engaged in obstruction of justice because there was a lie attached to what she was insisting comey say publicly but there s also misconduct of office. using federal agency for political purpose. that should be investigated. sean: let me go to jay. she bleached it. she destroyed she signed off on 20% of uranium going to putin. and the fbi didn t do anything about it. they cleared her. sean: statue of limitations, my friend. james comey became judge and jury in that case. the attorney general is not capable.
gregg: he should never have accepted the position to begin with. but i would not expect that he would not fire the guy that he just hired a short time ago. but an independent investigation is really what is needed, and open hearing, for everything. that is the only way that the american public can be assured that the impartial administration of justice. hannity: let me go to jay. r all of those laws in your view relevant, and what about mueller and comey being best friends and casually licking this because he wanted a special counsel appointed? jay: any applicable law has to be looked at. it is very tricky. when you have a witness that you have a close relationship with and not being impartial, so what happens then? does that really mean that comey is not a witness, because that
accepted the position to begin with. but i would not expect that he would not fire the guy that he just hired a short time ago. but an independent investigation is really what is needed, and open hearing, for everything. that is the only way that the american public can be assured that the impartial administration of justice. hannity: let me go to jay. r all of those laws in your view relevant, and what about mueller and comey being best friends and casually licking this because he wanted a special counsel appointed? jay: any applicable law has to be looked at. it is very tricky. when you have a witness that you have a close relationship with and not being impartial, so what happens then? does that really mean that comey is not a witness, because that
reporters would act the same way you think? i don t think so. i think on a wednesday if you bring on the foreign press because we re in a global economy and obviously to use a mitt romney world, tumult all over the world. let them ask questions. you don t take out the press briefings entirely. you get in different reporters that ask questions that the public will be i topics they care about. to take it out altogether, sean, the optics are horrible. it s been around for years. you have to take it off tv. let me finish here. sean: let me go to jay. jay, in the day and age of instagram, facebook, twitter and the president i ll give you an example, last night he did a sit-down interview with lester holt. off to their conspiracy theory cable channel and hours of dissection at a level that is so obscene and, again, they collu colluded with hillary. they don t deserve his time. right. well, you know, breaking news alerts you the president of the united states, you get two scoops of ice