Stay updated with breaking news from Lee firm. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Its similar to 44bonview and this is needing upgrading immediately to the public attention. So pretty much the outcome is that if the rear view would be removed, hell have to be more of a financial burden and his family will be in shock pause theyll lose another bedroom. So, please thank you. Youll have more time in rebuttal. So well now hear from the Planning Department. Mr. Sanchez . Thank you. Subject property at 44bofview, located within the r. H. 1 Zoning District and the special use district. I believe that the district was added to the planning code in 1991. Under this district it requires a 35 rear yard and approximately 24. 5 feet for the subject property. And so the main issues here relate to the extension of the rear and the ground level retaining wall and grading issues as well as the deck on top of that structure which for lack of a better term could be des ....
Lancaster and its police officers deny they attacked local man with deadly force and want to strike much of the complaint pennrecord.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from pennrecord.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Lee | The Lee Firm ALLENTOWN – A Lancaster man alleges that he was unlawfully assaulted, battered and tased with deadly force, without justification and in violation of his civil rights by local police officers in 2019. Ivan Ruiz-Rivera filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on May 6 versus the City and County of Lancaster, Lancaster County Police Officers Bingham and Lapp, John Does 1-5 and ABC Corporations 1-25. All parties are of Lancaster. “On or about Dec. 6, 2019, at 5:04 a.m., defendant Bingham, alleged that he was dispatched to 33 Belmont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, regarding an incident of domestic violence that involved the plaintiff, Ruiz-Rivera. The aforementioned call did not come from the residence in question, nor did it come from anyone who lived within the residence,” the suit states. ....