Juror B37 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Juror b37. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Juror B37 Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Welcome back. i m melissa harris-perry. two weeks ago six florida women acquitted george zimmerman of both second-degree murder and manslaughter in the trial for the death of trayvon martin. in the immediate aftermath of the verdict many asked how could this happen? the first inkling of an answer to that question came when juror b37, speaking in shadow, revealed to cnn s anderson cooper that she saw the events of that tragic night in florida from george zimmerman s perspective. that you would feel comfortable i think he was frustrated with the whole situation in the neighborhood, with the break-ins and the robberies and they actually arrested somebody not that long ago. okay. but then this week we learned that not everyone in that jury room saw george zimmerman as just a good guy who was frustrated and went a little too far. revealing both her face and her first name, juror b29 said she ....
I fought to the end. i mean, it s hard for me to sleep, it s hard for me to eat. i feel that i was forcefully included in trayvon martin s death, and i carry him on my back. i m hurting as much as trayvon martin s mommy, because there s no way that any mother should feel that pain. but you feel in your heart of hearts that you and the jury approached it and came with the decision and you stand by that decision to this day? i stand by the decision because of the law. if i stand by the decision because of my heart, he would have been guilty. that s not all she said. the first zimmerman juror, we heard from juror b37 that spoke with anderson more than a week ago. she too said she had no choice but to vote not guilty. however, b37 seems to hold a ....
Something wrong, but whether we can fit that into the law, that s the challenge. page, like juror b37 she seemed to be confused by the law. maddie said, that s where i felt confused. if a person kills someone, you get charged for it. as the law was read to me, if you have no proof he killed him intentionally, you can t say he s guilty. did she get that right? she did get that right but she started out as a guilty, a guilty on the more serious murder charge. what happened back in the jury room is you had other jurors who had listened to the defense explanation of the law and they convinced her and they convinced her and two others to switch their vote. what you have to do as a prosecution is the same thing mr. o mara did. follow the law. explain to your jurors why they re right. and a final question. a national push to review these stand your ground rules. the laws in florida. with this juror coming out and ....
Approached it and came with the decision and you stand by that decision to this day? i stand by the decision because of the law. if i stand by the decision because of my heart, he would have been guilty. that s not all she said. the first zimmerman juror, we heard from juror b37 that spoke with anderson more than a week ago. she too said she had no choice but to vote not guilty. however, b37 seems to hold a more charitable view of mr. zimmerman s actions that night. joining us martin family attorney benjamin crump. also joining us, jeffrey toobin and jose baez and mark geragos. jeff, let s start with you. ....
On the law. whether the prosecution properly explained the law. clearly this juror feels she rendered a verdict that went about her gut instinct and her belief about what it should have been. but because if you you go back to juror b37 that joy just mentioned, she also mentioned stand your ground. right. and they talked about that in the jury room. so obviously, there was some discussion about that could have been confusing and could have led her to believe, as seema said, that we re just just talking about self-defense here because this is not in any way mentioned in this transcript of this interview, ken. reverend, you re absolutely right. the law is confusing. when you listen to these jury instructions in any murder case, it is very confusing. lawyers disagree about exactly what things mean. it requires the prosecution to properly explain the law and apply it. not just explain it, but apply to it the facts that they presented in the trial. ....