i fought to the end. i mean, it s hard for me to sleep, it s hard for me to eat. i feel that i was forcefully included in trayvon martin s death, and i carry him on my back. i m hurting as much as trayvon martin s mommy, because there s no way that any mother should feel that pain. but you feel in your heart of hearts that you and the jury approached it and came with the decision and you stand by that decision to this day? i stand by the decision because of the law. if i stand by the decision because of my heart, he would have been guilty. that s not all she said. the first zimmerman juror, we heard from juror b37 that spoke with anderson more than a week ago. she too said she had no choice but to vote not guilty. however, b37 seems to hold a
approached it and came with the decision and you stand by that decision to this day? i stand by the decision because of the law. if i stand by the decision because of my heart, he would have been guilty. that s not all she said. the first zimmerman juror, we heard from juror b37 that spoke with anderson more than a week ago. she too said she had no choice but to vote not guilty. however, b37 seems to hold a more charitable view of mr. zimmerman s actions that night. joining us martin family attorney benjamin crump. also joining us, jeffrey toobin and jose baez and mark geragos. jeff, let s start with you.
more charitable view of mr. zimmerman s actions that night. joining us martin family attorney benjamin crump. also joining us, jeffrey toobin and jose baez and mark geragos. jeff, let s start with you. juror b29 says that zimmerman was guilty but could not vote for guilt on either second degree murder or manslaughter because as the law was read to her, and i m quoting now, you have no proof that he killed him intentionally. those were her words. does that make sense to you legally speaking? well, it certainly is a garbled reading of the law. the issue wasn t intention. the issue wasn t zimmerman s intention.