workplace? i am how do you get people back into the workplace? iam here how do you get people back into the workplace? i am here at the greenwich peninsula to find out. it was an extraordinary night in the champions league. liverpool staged a second half comeback to beat the italian side ac milan at anfield, while manchester city won a nine goal thriller. whilst there will be the odd touch of fog and shower, most places have a dry day. it s thursday the 16th of september. our top story. after a ruthless day of firing and hiring, the prime minister is set to continue the biggest shake up of his government since he entered downing street. gavin williamson was sacked as education secretary, while dominic raab was demoted from his role as foreign secretary. he ll be replaced by liz truss. borisjohnson has promised that his new cabinet will work tirelessly to unite the country, as our political correspondent, helen catt, reports. there were hirings, firings and some eye catching
hello. fighting the coronavirus pandemic has been a monumental task for all nations, but for those in developing countries, having limited access to vaccines has proved to be disastrous. at a meeting on monday, the world trade organization will be discussing a proposal first put forward by india and south africa back in october, to suspend patents on covid vaccines for the duration of the pandemic. the aim is to speed up access to affordable medical products for the prevention and treatment of covid 19. the debate is over the best way to achieve this, and whether suspending patents is the answer. the us has backed a waiver, but not everyone is convinced. joining me now is diarmaid mcdonald, lead organiser atjust treatment. who opposes this and why? this is reall who opposes this and why? ti 3 is really interesting, it s going to be the first time the world trade organization meets with the us switching sides in the debate. previously, this proposal made first in october last
the us federal reserve will decide whether to raise interest rates later today, although they re expected to remain at 0.25% unchanged from march 2020. fed chairmanjerome powell is expected to plot a path of higher interest rates next year. economists polled by reuters expect the fed to raise interest rates in the third quarter of next year. last month the federal reserve outlined plans to withdraw the billions of dollars it has been pumping into the economy during the pandemic. since the start of the covid crisis, the us central bank has been buying $120 billion worth of bonds every month to help keep borrowing costs low. fed chairjerome powell said he expected economic growth to strengthen over the rest of the year. however, he said then the fed can be patient about raising interest rates. but inflation is raging in the us with annual inflation at rates not seen for a0 years. the latest figures show prices rose 6.8% in the year to november. and speculation is mounting tha
he is the new york times reporter at the supreme court. he is a graduate of harvard college and yale law school. he is one of those reporters who with a career turn here or there could have become one of the people he is now covering at the supreme court. and today adam liptack has the lead story in the new york times not because the supreme court did something today, not because the supreme court issued an historic life changing ruling today, but adam liptack has the lead story in the new york times today because of what the supreme court might do. here is the first sentence of the new york times lead story on page one in that upper right corner today, a transformed supreme court returns to the bench on monday to start a momentous term in which it will consider eliminating the constitutional right to abortion, vastly expanding gun rights, and further chipping away at the wall separating church and state. it did not have to be this way. those things did not have to be
here or there, could have become one of the people, he is now covering at the supreme court, and today, adam liptak, has the lead story in the new york times, not because the supreme court did something, today, not because the supreme court issued an historic, life-changing ruling today. but, adam liptak has the mainstream new york times today, because of what the supreme court might do. here is the first sentence, of the new york times lead story on page one, in that upper right corner today, a transform supreme court, returns to the bench on monday to start a momentous term, in which it will consider eliminating the constitutional right to abortion. vastly expanding gun rights and further chipping away at the wall separating church and state. it did not have to be this way. those things, did not have to be on the supreme court s agenda tonight. but they are there. because the supreme court has never been enough, for democratic voters. the supreme court has never been enough