subpoenaed. were their lives disturbed?? they bankrupted with legal fees? no. inin fac fact, a state judge cae ronald jamison endorsed with the kennedy electordy elec done.ai he said that by sending an alternative elevation certificate, even when they were losing in the vote count, can these electors all of them democrats, had taken an important step, one that preserved their win aftermocrat the recount. that s how the system works. that s how the system works.s,h so after the twenty twenty election, trump electors in arizona trump, michigan, wisconsin, georgia, pennsylvania, new mexico, nevada use virtuallye sae the e language as tenney s. hawaii s electors haded i usd in nineteen sixty. but this time these were not alternative electors. they were criminals. this is part of a criminal plot . overthrow the u.s. government. they were insurrectionists. they were trying tveo interferrt with the work of the real electors and that too was a novel crime because as of the five year
0 with your morning moccia. your thermostat learns your favorite temp and creates a schedule for your home. i love saving money before breakfast. tom brady. you can never bet against him. when does age ultimately catch up to him? i feel like the saints are loaded. they ve had tom brady s number and they could be a realxt surprise to the nfl sunday on fox. g. good evening and welcome to tucker carlson said, man,. things are moving fastso muc. so much is going on , as we tra often say that it s very easy to lose track ofe the big lives things, the things that matter, the things that will define history in the livesan ofbiden our children and grandchildren. but joe biden s now famoust blood red speech of september 1st certainly qualifies as one of. the big things.nl in that speech, biden announced that not only is his programrogm the best for this country,hat that s conventional. presidents always say that bidehen was that going forward,o his program is the only program alloweind
what they knew and when they knew it. bottom line, congressman. if other witnesses like say mark meadows or dan scavino or kash patel end up defying their subpoenas, would you support a criminal content for referral for them as well? we ll see. that s one of the arguments a number of us used to vote this past week because they, nin fac, are communicating. i wouldn t say complying, but they re at least negotiating. they re discussing. they re talking with the committee and the committee didn t feel like they needed to issue a criminal subpoena even though i think they were issued all on the same day, but in fact, they re cooperating and that, to me, is a good thing. what if they subpoena the former president, donald trump? we ll see where all this takes us. i think you ve got to do one step at a time. let s see what evidence comes in. what evidence they have to share with members that are not on the select committee.