Defenders of the amazon rain forest from covert 19 as brazils total faces paseo 100000. Madagascar starts axford in a horrible tonic its president touts as a coronavirus shore despite the w. H. O. Warning there is no proof it works. Hello Health Officials in afghanistan fear the coronavirus outbreak there is spreading far more rapidly than previously thought it follows the random testing of 500 people in kabul with more than 150 of them testing positive the suggests around the 3rd of the capitals residents could be infected in russia cases there are continuing to surge its registered its 4th record one day rise with over 10000. 00 new infections bringing the total there to nearly 135000 but both italy and spain 2 of the countrys worst affected by the pandemic have registered their lowest daily number of coronavirus deaths and nearly 7 weeks so as infection numbers rise in Afghanistan Afghan Migrant Workers who fled iran when its death toll soared or now heading back but its led to trag
A full state funeral for Hosni Mubarak the long time president objections forced from power during the 2011 revolution. And the corona Virus Outbreak is having a far reaching impact across sport the president of the womens tennis the boss says the crisis closes in our president the talent. Pool for the 1st time since the corona Virus Outbreak began the number of new infections outside china has exceeded the number within 37 countries have tallied 427 new cases will beijing says is counted 411. 00 earlier the World Health Organization warns immediate action is needed to prevent it becoming a pandemic where its widespread around the world where one country is seeing rise. In fatalities is iran at least 19 people have died there and 130 are infected including the Deputy Health minister in south korea the number of cases has past 12 hundreds the largest number of infections outside Mainland China churches have cancelled religious services and as japan tries to limit the spread Prime Minist
Do you make of the white house statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process
Statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process protections that we think about
Statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process protections that we think about