Do you make of the white house statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process
Statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process protections that we think about
Statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process protections that we think about
Availability of the armorpiercing bullets. Dallas police have blamed them for penetrating their vests, why has your administration not re stricted the sale of armor piercing rounds . We have been trying to do that for a long time. It has not happened, sir. I know it has not. The first bill to stop the armorpiercing bullets was introduced by pat moynahan and me years ago, and so what we get is resistance from the republican congress. What is the support of armorpiercing rounds . There is none, zero, zero, zero. What is the administration willing to do to restrict the sale of armorpiercing rounds now after dallas . Before dallas and after dallas were prepared to do everything we can to be able to do that and have it stick. And sir, can you be more specific . Are you going to do something through the atf or will it be an executive action . Well, there is a debate as to whether or not there is an authority and executive action. I think we have the authority. And there is a concern that if
This is your skin. This is your skin in the sun. The sun ages your skin and can cause skin cancer. Omar villafranca has more on the lives that surgeons could not save. Reporter thursdays attack in Downtown Dallas killed five people who had one thing in common, they all wore police uniforms. 32yearold Patrick Zamarippa, 48yearold lorne ahrens, 40yearold michael krol, 43yearold Brent Thompson, and 55yearold Michael Smith were killed by a killers bullet. Sergeant smith spent 33 years with the Police Department, and was only two years away from retirement. His nineyearold daughter carolyn remembers the last time she saw her father. So he was leaving to go to work and i was leaving to go to a movie. And he said to me what if this is the last time you ever kissed me or hugged me . Did he always say that . No. That was probably the first time he ever said that. Was this kiss any different . Yes. It was. How . It just felt different to me. I felt something bad was going to happen. Reporter dur