here or there, could have become one of the people, he is now covering at the supreme court, and today, adam liptak, has the lead story in the new york times, not because the supreme court did something, today, not because the supreme court issued an historic, life-changing ruling today. but, adam liptak has the mainstream new york times today, because of what the supreme court might do. here is the first sentence, of the new york times lead story on page one, in that upper right corner today, a transform supreme court, returns to the bench on monday to start a momentous term, in which it will consider eliminating the constitutional right to abortion. vastly expanding gun rights and further chipping away at the wall separating church and state. it did not have to be this way. those things, did not have to be on the supreme court s agenda tonight. but they are there. because the supreme court has never been enough, for democratic voters. the supreme court has never been enough
Federal judge advances lawsuit over Texas abortion funds courthousenews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from courthousenews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.