Fire comey. there are specific questions about kushner and this is how a conspiracy unfolds. everyone gets nervous about everyone else and if in fact there is a conspiracy to collude or cooperate or undermine an election, each person is going to eventually be out for themselves. the whole coconspirator, line of questions in what we just saw tonight are fascinating and will probably be terrifying to a bunch of people whose been outside of our focus lately. what s interesting to me is that, it said what communications did you have with cohen, and other russian developmenters during the campaign, we know two weeks ago his personal attorney s office, home and hotel room were raided by the fbi. that is factoring into these questions. talk to me about that, can you renado? well absolutely. what we don t know, and what s
I d of said you re dreaming. dreaming! definitely dreaming. then again, dreaming is how i got this far. now more businesses in more places can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america s largest gig-speed network. we re back with our breaking news tonight, nearly 50 questions robert mueller wants to ask the president to determine whether he obstructed justice. back with me now, evan, juliet, michael and renado. michael, these questions related to attorney general jefs sessions. what did you think and do regarding the accuse l of mr. sessions? what effort did you make to try to get hem to change his mind? did you discuss whether mr. sessions would protect you in reference attorney general? what did you think and react to the news and appointment of special counsel?
General for basically doing what he had to do. he was required to do under the rules of the justice department. renado i have to ask you, when you re dealing with obstruction, i m not an attorney but that s what i hear from the attorneys and legal folks here, you have to establish intent correct? what is the intent? and i m wondering if the president s tweets, what he said is that going to come into play when they re trying to figure out what his intent was behindfully of these meetings and questions or his actions? no question. so what mueller has to prove is that president had corrupt intent, in other words the intent to unlawfully interfere with or impede the investigation. the way you prove as a prosecutor, somebody s intent, you don t have a magic telescope that sees inside their brain. you look at their words and actions over a long period of time and you ask a jury to form conclusions about the person s intent from those words and actions. so, for example, why was the presid
Election, each person is going to eventually be out for themselves. the whole coconspirator, line of questions in what we just saw tonight are fascinating and will probably be terrifying to a bunch of people whose been outside of our focus lately. what s interesting to me is that, it said what communications did you have with cohen, and other russian developers during the campaign, we know two weeks ago his personal attorney s office, home and hotel room were raided by the fbi. that is factoring into these questions. talk to me about that, can you renado? well absolutely. what we don t know, and what s really not in these questions is, what information does mueller have about some of these other categories? to me the most interesting thing that i gain from reading these questions, don, were you noted that all the questions about the
Choice but to recuse himself in this investigation, simply because he played a role in the campaign, and the justice department rules make it clear he has to recuse himself. the president doesn t buy this but that is the truth. he s been mad at the attorney general for basically doing what he had to do. he was required to do under the rules of the justice department. renado i have to ask you, when you re dealing with obstruction, i m not an attorney but that s what i hear from the attorneys and legal folks here, you have to establish intent correct? what is the intent? and i m wondering if the president s tweets, what he said is that going to come into play when they re trying to figure out what his intent was behindfully of these meetings and questions or his actions? no question. so what mueller has to prove is that president had corrupt intent, in other words the intent to unlawfully interfere with or impede the