Significant case in the United States history. 9 11, 2001. Usama bin laden and other terrorists hated our democracy tried to destroy it. Donald trump, just like those other threats to american democracy, tried to destroy our system. This is the greatest political crime since succession. This has a chance of going to trial before the election and thats exactly what jack smith did. He knows what hes doing and he did it here. This case can be tried before the election. I dont see any reason why it shouldnt. The election will be simply about where will trump serve his next term . In the white house or in The Big House . Greg they want to send trump to The Big House before you voters even get the chance to send him back to the white house. Legal experts and republicans argue this indictment is an attack on the First Amendment. Political speech now has been criminalized. The First Amendment is under assault. Its under attack by the biden administration. You see a lot of deceitful conduct but
Discussion with god, why are they only attacking one or in reference to mr. To mr. Wade . And then she goes on. To say, god isnt it them playing the race card when they only question one. Now, if she had been truthful with that congregation, truthful with the community, she wouldve said i had a relationship with him good, bad, forgive me. Whatever thats what she should have said. But she chose to deflect and say the them the reference to them and the others and they saw obviously a reference to that motion filed by him by ms merchants. They choose to go after the black man and she then goes on again deflecting away and deflecting to the what i call the third rail in american society, choosing somebody on the other side of being a racist so and so is a racist. Theyre racist she was the one playing the race card in a way to try to deflect from her own conduct she goes on to say in discussions with the lord, god, is that is it that some some will never see a black man is qualified, no mat
This time than what we might have otherwise been expecting. If the allegations in this indictment are proven Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and a jury convicts some of these crimes, history will not ask, wow, how did america get to the point where they indicted a former president . History instead is going to ask, how did america get to the point where such a person could be elected to the presidency of the United States. Were actions such as these could be carried out from the oval office directed by a person who was elected president by the American People, along with his advisers. This is a grave day and a serious one for our country. Thank you for being with us here tonight. We know you had every choice in the world. But we are happy to have you here on what will go down in u. S. History as a black letter, bold faced date, August 1st 2023 is the date on which a former president and the leading president ial candidate of the Republican Party was indicted in Federal Court, accused of lead
In mind. Thank you for doing that, we will pick up exactly where you left off. Have a good weekend. Have a good show. Good show. Russia without putin, that was one of the chants shouted by the people who Alexei Navalny, thousands of people who knew that they were risking their freedom, possibly their lives to say that. Alexei navalny who was harassed, poisoned imprisoned, and ultimately killed is proof of what happens to those Who Defy Putin and russia. Navalnys widow yulia and their two children did not attend the funeral because of fears of their own safety, Russian Police patrol the funeral, they stopped mourners from entering the church, unable to view, as you saw the open casket where navalnys body was covered with Red And White roses. The New York Times reports that Cell Phone Service in the area had been reduced to the lower band with 3g standard and described it as a mobile shutdown. Thats what it means to live in russia with putin. Despite this, a quarter of 1 Million People s
And then she goes on to say, god, isnt it them playing the race card when they only question one. Now, if she had been truthful with that congregation, truthful with the community, she would have said, i had a relationship with him. Good, bad, forgive me, whatever, thats what she should have said. But she chose to deflect and say them, the reference to them and the others and they. Its obviously a reference to the motion filed by ms. Merchan. They choose to go after the black man. And she then goes on, again, deflecting away, and deflecting to the what i call the third rail in american society. Accusing somebody on the other side of being a racist. So and so is a racist. Theyre racist. She was the one playing the race card in a way to deflect from her own conduct. She goes on to say in her discussions with the lord. God, is it that some will never see a black man as qualified no matter his achievements, again, the deflection. What is she saying . The listener is not necessarily in that