manage service appointments and find answers to your questions. you can even check your connection status on your phone. now it s easier than ever to manage your account. get started at xfinity.com/myaccount i think this goes without saying, george zimmerman seems to be a magnet for trouble. wherever he goes, problems seem to follow him. and yesterday, proof positive because zimmerman was involved in a violent confrontation in florida. this time it wasn t zimmerman pulling triggers. he was the one who was shot at and hurt. he was hit in the face with car glass and debris. he only suffered minor injuries and moments ago, the lake mary
juror b29 says that zimmerman was guilty but could not vote for guilt on either second degree murder or manslaughter because as the law was read to her, and i m quoting now, you have no proof that he killed him intentionally. those were her words. does that make sense to you legally speaking? well, it certainly is a garbled reading of the law. the issue wasn t intention. the issue wasn t zimmerman s intention. it was whether he was legitimately exercising self-defense or not. but look, she s not a lawyer. that s not a big difference. what i think is important to say just at the outset is that second thoughts by jurors are fairly common, and they have no legal significance. you can t get a verdict set aside. you can t change you can t get a retrial. nothing can happen as a result of a juror saying i wish i had voted another way. benjamin crump, let me play another part of the interview
more charitable view of mr. zimmerman s actions that night. joining us martin family attorney benjamin crump. also joining us, jeffrey toobin and jose baez and mark geragos. jeff, let s start with you. juror b29 says that zimmerman was guilty but could not vote for guilt on either second degree murder or manslaughter because as the law was read to her, and i m quoting now, you have no proof that he killed him intentionally. those were her words. does that make sense to you legally speaking? well, it certainly is a garbled reading of the law. the issue wasn t intention. the issue wasn t zimmerman s intention.
but to vote not guyty. however, b-37 seems to hold a more charitable view of mr. zimmerman s actions that night. joining us tonight martin family attorney benjamin crump, getting his first look at the jurors account and jeffrey toobin and jose bias and mark cgeragos. jeff, let s start with you. juror b-29 said zimmerman was guilty but could not vote for guilt on second-degree murder or manslaughter because as the law was read to her, and i m quoting now, you have no proof that he killed him intentionally. those were her words sdch. does that make sense to you? that s a garbled reading of the law. the issue wasn t intention. the issue wasn t zimmerman s intention. it was whether he was
happened in the beginning and now being preementive and now it is gone through the jury process and judged by the jury and justice will be served and remain calm and that s the way to go. over all, how do you think the case has been handled and the way it went in closing arguments. do you feel that the defense made a case for self defense? i think the defense did a good job, but more importantly i don t think the prosecutions did a good job with the second-degree murder charge where they had to prove zimmerman had ill will and depraved heart and wanted to kill trayvon in cold blood. the prosecutions didn t do a good job. it was a uphill battle from the beginning to do something like that. but i think that there is