tonight, we want to get some important context of the supreme court s latest ruling this term. because while we can go through the immediate ramifications of those decisions. and it s obviously important and necessary to do that. we also need to start looking to the future. in one sense to understand how ending our changing policies will affect the fabric of our society. but in another, to look at the unknown. and there s a lot we don t know because within the court s decision there is vague language that will be exploited by conservatives looking to further curtail rights. there are some urgings from republican appointed justices to legal activists pushing them to bring up cases that will also further curtail these rights. enough, fact in his term and in the last term the supreme court open pandora s box. the creative versus the court ruled that a christian web designer has the right to refuse her services of designing wedding websites to same-sex couples. the majo
tonight, we want to get some important context of the supreme court s latest ruling this term. because while we can go through the immediate ramifications of those decisions. and it s obviously important and necessary to do that. we also need to start looking to the future. in one sense to understand how ending our changing policies will affect the fabric of our society. but in another, to look at the unknown. and there s a lot we don t know because within the court s decision there is vague language that will be exploited by conservatives looking to further curtail rights. there are some urgings from republican appointed justices to legal activists pushing them to bring up cases that will also further curtail these rights. enough, fact in his term and in the last term the supreme court open pandora s box. the creative versus the court ruled that a christian web designer has the right to refuse her services of designing wedding websites to same-sex couples. the majority o
marriage. how that will play out in the senate, why do they even need to do it. the 11th hour gets underway on this tuesday night. good evening, once again, i am stephanie ruhle, live at msnbc headquarters here in new york city. the january 6th committee gathers more evidence ahead of thursday s primetime hearing. the secret service is coming under some major scrutiny tonight over missing text messages from january 5th and sixth. on friday, the committee issued a subpoena for those messages after inspector general notified them that they had been deleted. today, nbc news learned the agency, now, has said they have no new text related to the attack to give house members, meaning they can t find any of them. the secret services they lost the texts as part of a technology upgrade. they received for requests from congressional committees on january 16th to preserve records, and they had this planned migration for the 25th, i believe, of january. nobody along the way stopped a
thursday s primetime hearing. the secret service is coming under some major scrutiny tonight over missing text messages from january 5th and sixth. on friday, the committee issued a subpoena for those messages after inspector general notified them that they had been deleted. today, nbc news learned the agency, now, has said they have no new text related to the attack to give house members, meaning they can t find any of them. the secret services they lost the texts as part of a technology upgrade. they received for requests from congressional committees on january 16th to preserve records, and they had this planned migration for the 25th, i believe, of january. nobody along the way stopped and thought, well, maybe we shouldn t do the migration of data and of the devices until we are able to fulfill these requests. their process, as explained to us, was simply to leave it to the agent to determine whether or not there was anything on their phones worth saving that was necess
pottinger and former deputy press secretary sarah matthews t. two were inside the white house on january 6th 20, 21, were among the most high-profile officials to resign in protest in the aftermath of that attack. the new york times is reporting this about their role. mr. pottinger and ms. matthews are expected to help narrate what was unfolding in the west wing during those 187 minutes in a hearing that the committee sees as a capstone to a series of public sessions in which it laid out in detail trump s efforts to remain in office despite his defeat and how they led to the storming of the capitol. ms. matthews is expected to, among other things, speak to the efforts to get mr. trump to issue a statement. people familiar with the planning said by having them testify, the committee is sticking to what is now a tried and true practice of having trump insiders tell us the story of january 6th and explain the ex-president s push to overturn the 2020 election. with help from al